Insulin dose optimization using an automated artificial intelligence-based decision support system in youths with type 1 diabetes
- PMID: 32908282
- DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1045-7
Insulin dose optimization using an automated artificial intelligence-based decision support system in youths with type 1 diabetes
Abstract
Despite the increasing adoption of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring devices, most people with type 1 diabetes do not achieve their glycemic goals1. This could be related to a lack of expertise or inadequate time for clinicians to analyze complex sensor-augmented pump data. We tested whether frequent insulin dose adjustments guided by an automated artificial intelligence-based decision support system (AI-DSS) is as effective and safe as those guided by physicians in controlling glucose levels. ADVICE4U was a six-month, multicenter, multinational, parallel, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in 108 participants with type 1 diabetes, aged 10-21 years and using insulin pump therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT03003806). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive remote insulin dose adjustment every three weeks guided by either an AI-DSS, (AI-DSS arm, n = 54) or by physicians (physician arm, n = 54). The results for the primary efficacy measure-the percentage of time spent within the target glucose range (70-180 mg dl-1 (3.9-10.0 mmol l-1))-in the AI-DSS arm were statistically non-inferior to those in the physician arm (50.2 ± 11.1% versus 51.6 ± 11.3%, respectively, P < 1 × 10-7). The percentage of readings below 54 mg dl-1 (<3.0 mmol l-1) within the AI-DSS arm was statistically non-inferior to that in the physician arm (1.3 ± 1.4% versus 1.0 ± 0.9%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Three severe adverse events related to diabetes (two severe hypoglycemia, one diabetic ketoacidosis) were reported in the physician arm and none in the AI-DSS arm. In conclusion, use of an automated decision support tool for optimizing insulin pump settings was non-inferior to intensive insulin titration provided by physicians from specialized academic diabetes centers.
Similar articles
-
Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Informed Advisory System with Automated Titration and Dosing of Insulin Reduces Glucose Variability in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Aug;20(8):531-540. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0079. Epub 2018 Jul 6. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018. PMID: 29979618 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A pilot non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to assess automatic adjustments of insulin doses in adolescents with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections therapy.Pediatr Diabetes. 2020 Sep;21(6):950-959. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13052. Epub 2020 Jun 11. Pediatr Diabetes. 2020. PMID: 32418302 Clinical Trial.
-
Night glucose control with MD-Logic artificial pancreas in home setting: a single blind, randomized crossover trial-interim analysis.Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Mar;15(2):91-9. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12071. Epub 2013 Aug 15. Pediatr Diabetes. 2014. PMID: 23944875 Clinical Trial.
-
Evolution of Diabetes Technology.Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;49(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Dec 4. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2020. PMID: 31980111 Review.
-
Advanced Diabetes Management Using Artificial Intelligence and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors.Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 10;20(14):3870. doi: 10.3390/s20143870. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32664432 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Optimizing methadone dose adjustment in patients with opioid use disorder.Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 8;14:1258029. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1258029. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38260800 Free PMC article.
-
AI-based diabetes care: risk prediction models and implementation concerns.NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Feb 15;7(1):36. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01034-7. NPJ Digit Med. 2024. PMID: 38361152 Free PMC article.
-
The promises and limitations of artificial intelligence for quality improvement, patient safety, and research in hospital medicine.J Hosp Med. 2025 Jan;20(1):85-88. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13404. Epub 2024 May 15. J Hosp Med. 2025. PMID: 38751246 No abstract available.
-
Effectiveness and safety of AI-driven closed-loop systems in diabetes management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Jun 23;17(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13098-025-01819-0. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025. PMID: 40551160 Free PMC article. Review.
-
E-health as a sine qua non for modern healthcare.RMD Open. 2022 Sep;8(2):e002401. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002401. RMD Open. 2022. PMID: 36123014 Free PMC article.
References
-
- The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 329, 977–986 (1993). - DOI
-
- American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2019. Diabetes Care 42, S1–S193 (2019). - DOI
-
- Foster N. C. et al. Marked increases in CGM use has not prevented increases in HbA1c levels in participants in the T1D exchange (T1DX) clinic network. Diabetes 67 (2018); https://doi.org/10.2337/db18-1689-P
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical