Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 25;54(1):87-96.
doi: 10.2141/jpsa.0160066.

Qualitative and Quantitative Comparisons of Texture Characteristics between Broiler and Jidori-niku, Japanese Indigenous Chicken Meat, Assessed by a Trained Panel

Affiliations

Qualitative and Quantitative Comparisons of Texture Characteristics between Broiler and Jidori-niku, Japanese Indigenous Chicken Meat, Assessed by a Trained Panel

Keisuke Sasaki et al. J Poult Sci. .

Abstract

The texture of jidori-niku (Japanese indigenous native chicken meat) was characterized and compared with those of Chunky broiler chicken meat. Experiment 1: A qualitative sensory test using jidori-niku and broiler breast (pectoralis major, PM), thigh (biceps femoris, BF) and sasami (deep pectoral) meat cooked to the end-point temperature 75°C by steam-heating was administered to a trained sensory panel (n=16-17) for the selection of descriptive texture items from ISO5492 texture words. By the correspondence analysis, the characteristics of 'chewiness,' 'hardness' and 'springiness' were found to be different between jidori-niku and broiler: they likely characterize jidori-niku texture. Experiment 2: Texture characteristics in the three above-mentioned muscles in jidori-niku and broiler were compared quantitatively using the three above-mentioned texture items by the trained sensory panel. Sensory chewiness and hardness were the highest in the broiler PM and second highest in the jidori-niku BF, whereas sensory springiness was the highest in the jidori-niku BF. These results suggest that jidori-niku-like texture was characterized as a springy texture as compared to broiler meat.

Keywords: broiler; jidori-niku; sensory; springiness; texture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Correspondence analysis of texture terms for broiler and jidori-niku pectoralis major (PM), biceps femoris (BF), and deep pectoral (DP) muscles. (A): Plot of correspondence scored of each muscle sample. Closed circles and triangles indicate broiler and jidori-niku samples, respectively. (B): The coordinates for the texture items related to factors 1 and 2. ●: hardness, ▴: chewiness, ■: springiness, △: surface moisture, and ◊: body moisture. Lowercase letters indicate the texture items by item code indicated in Table 1. The continuous lines in the panel indicate texture attributes associated with factor 1 (x-axis), such as chewiness (c1–c4), hardness (h1–h4) and springiness (s1–s4). The broken lines indicate texture attributes associated with factor 2 (y-axis) such as surface and body moistures (sm1–sm3 and bm1–bm6, respectively). (C): The coordinates for the texture items not related to factors 1 and 2. ◆: gumminess, ○: fattiness, ×: fracturability, +: conformation, and *: adhesiveness. Lowercase letters indicate the texture items by item code indicated in Table 1 as same as panel (B).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Sensory chewiness (A),hardness (B),and springiness (C) ratings of broiler and jidori-niku PM,BF,and DP muscles assessed by the trained sensory panel. Open circles indicate broiler meat and closed circles indicate jidori-niku meat. Values are expressed as least squares means±SEM. Values with different superscripts within each panel differ significantly (P<0.05).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Instrumental texture characteristics of broiler and jidori-niku PM,BF,and DP muscles. A: Shear-Force values, B: Texture profile analysis (TPA) hardness. C: TPA gumminess. D: TPA springiness. Open circles indicate broiler meat and closed circles indicate jidori-niku meat. Values are least squares means±SEM. Values with different superscripts within each panel differ significantly (P<0.05).

References

    1. Caine WR, Aalhus JL, Best DR, Dugan MER, Jeremiah LE. Relationship of texture profile analysis and Warner-Bratzler shear force with sensory characteristics of beef rib steaks. Meat Science, 64: 333-339. 2003. - PubMed
    1. Font-i-Furnols M, Guerrero L. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat Science, 98: 361-371. 2014. - PubMed
    1. Fujimura S, Koga H, Takeda H, Tone N, Kadowaki M, Ishibashi T. Role of taste-active components, glutamic acid, 5′-inosinic acid and potassium ion in taste of chicken meat extract. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science, 67: 423-429. 1996. a.
    1. Fujimura S, Koga H, Takeda H, Tone N, Kadowaki M, Ishibashi T. Chemical compositions of pectoral meat of Japanese native chicken, Hinai-jidori, and broiler of the same and marketing age. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science, 67: 541-548. 1996. b
    1. Grunert KG, Bredahl L, Brunsø K. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector – a review. Meat Science, 66: 259-272. 2004. - PubMed