Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2020 Sep 2:2020.08.31.20184788.
doi: 10.1101/2020.08.31.20184788.

Comparative performance of five commercially available serologic assays to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and identify individuals with high neutralizing titers

Affiliations

Comparative performance of five commercially available serologic assays to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and identify individuals with high neutralizing titers

Eshan U Patel et al. medRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

Accurate serological assays to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are needed to characterize the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection and identify potential candidates for COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) donation. This study compared the performance of commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to detect IgG or total antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and neutralizing antibodies (nAb). The diagnostic accuracy of five commercially available EIAs (Abbott, Euroimmun, EDI, ImmunoDiagnostics, and Roche) to detect IgG or total antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated from cross-sectional samples of potential CCP donors that had prior molecular confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection for sensitivity (n=214) and pre-pandemic emergency department patients for specificity (n=1,102). Of the 214 potential CCP donors, all were sampled >14 days since symptom onset and only a minority had been hospitalized due to COVID-19 (n=16 [7.5%]); 140 potential CCP donors were tested by all five EIAs and a microneutralization assay. When performed according to the manufacturers' protocol to detect IgG or total antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, the sensitivity of each EIA ranged from 76.4% to 93.9%, and the specificity of each EIA ranged from 87.0% to 99.6%. Using a nAb titer cutoff of ≥160 as the reference positive test (n=140 CCP donors), the empirical area under receiver operating curve of each EIA ranged from 0.66 (Roche) to 0.90 (Euroimmun). Commercial EIAs with high diagnostic accuracy to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies did not necessarily have high diagnostic accuracy to detect high nAbs. Some but not all commercial EIAs may be useful in the identification of individuals with high nAbs in convalescent individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Correlations between SARS-CoV-2 enzyme immunoassay antibody titers and neutralizing antibody titer AUC values in COVID-19 convalescent individuals (n=140).
Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI) estimated over 1000 bootstrap iterations.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Empirical receiver operating curve analysis for various SARS-CoV-2 enzyme immunoassays to detect high neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers at various thresholds (n=140).
Four thresholds for a high nAb AUC value were examined as the reference positive test.

References

    1. Johns Hopkins University. COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (accessed Aug 20, 2020).
    1. Theel ES, Slev P, Wheeler S, Couturier MR, Wong SJ, Kadkhoda K. The Role of Antibody Testing for SARS-CoV-2: Is There One? J Clin Microbiol 2020; 58 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00797-20 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. In Vitro Diagnostic EUAs. 2020. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-em... (accessed Aug 18, 2020).
    1. Lisboa Bastos M, Tavaziva G, Abidi SK, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for covid-19: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2020; 370: m2516. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, Takwoingi Y, et al. Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2. Cochrane database Syst Rev 2020; 6: CD013652. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types