Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;81(4-5):961-980.
doi: 10.1007/s00285-020-01533-7. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

Caterpillars on three and four leaves are sufficient to reconstruct binary normal networks

Affiliations

Caterpillars on three and four leaves are sufficient to reconstruct binary normal networks

Simone Linz et al. J Math Biol. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

While every rooted binary phylogenetic tree is determined by its set of displayed rooted triples, such a result does not hold for an arbitrary rooted binary phylogenetic network. In particular, there exist two non-isomorphic rooted binary temporal normal networks that display the same set of rooted triples. Moreover, without any structural constraint on the rooted phylogenetic networks under consideration, similarly negative results have also been established for binets and trinets which are rooted subnetworks on two and three leaves, respectively. Hence, in general, piecing together a rooted phylogenetic network from such a set of small building blocks appears insurmountable. In contrast to these results, in this paper, we show that a rooted binary normal network is determined by its sets of displayed caterpillars (particular type of subtrees) on three and four leaves. The proof is constructive and realises a polynomial-time algorithm that takes the sets of caterpillars on three and four leaves displayed by a rooted binary normal network and, up to isomorphism, reconstructs this network.

Keywords: Normal networks; Quads; Rooted triples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aho AV, Sagiv Y, Szymanski TG, Ullman JD (1981) Inferring a tree from lowest common ancestors with an application to the optimization of relational expressions. SIAM J Comput 10:405–421 - DOI
    1. Bickner DR (2012) On normal networks. Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
    1. Bininda-Emonds ORP (2004) The evolution of supertrees. Trends Ecol Evol 19:315–322 - DOI
    1. Bordewich M, Semple C (2016) Determining phylogenetic networks from inter-taxa distances. J Math Biol 73:283–303 - DOI
    1. Bordewich M, Huber KT, Moulton V, Semple C (2018) Recovering normal networks from shortest inter-taxa distance information. J Math Biol 77:571–594 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources