Caterpillars on three and four leaves are sufficient to reconstruct binary normal networks
- PMID: 32909104
- DOI: 10.1007/s00285-020-01533-7
Caterpillars on three and four leaves are sufficient to reconstruct binary normal networks
Abstract
While every rooted binary phylogenetic tree is determined by its set of displayed rooted triples, such a result does not hold for an arbitrary rooted binary phylogenetic network. In particular, there exist two non-isomorphic rooted binary temporal normal networks that display the same set of rooted triples. Moreover, without any structural constraint on the rooted phylogenetic networks under consideration, similarly negative results have also been established for binets and trinets which are rooted subnetworks on two and three leaves, respectively. Hence, in general, piecing together a rooted phylogenetic network from such a set of small building blocks appears insurmountable. In contrast to these results, in this paper, we show that a rooted binary normal network is determined by its sets of displayed caterpillars (particular type of subtrees) on three and four leaves. The proof is constructive and realises a polynomial-time algorithm that takes the sets of caterpillars on three and four leaves displayed by a rooted binary normal network and, up to isomorphism, reconstructs this network.
Keywords: Normal networks; Quads; Rooted triples.
Similar articles
-
Trinets encode orchard phylogenetic networks.J Math Biol. 2021 Aug 21;83(3):28. doi: 10.1007/s00285-021-01654-7. J Math Biol. 2021. PMID: 34420100
-
Binets: Fundamental Building Blocks for Phylogenetic Networks.Bull Math Biol. 2017 May;79(5):1135-1154. doi: 10.1007/s11538-017-0275-4. Epub 2017 Apr 6. Bull Math Biol. 2017. PMID: 28386669 Free PMC article.
-
Trinets encode tree-child and level-2 phylogenetic networks.J Math Biol. 2014 Jun;68(7):1707-29. doi: 10.1007/s00285-013-0683-5. Epub 2013 May 17. J Math Biol. 2014. PMID: 23680992
-
An interchange property for the rooted phylogenetic subnet diversity on phylogenetic networks.J Math Biol. 2024 Oct 4;89(5):48. doi: 10.1007/s00285-024-02142-4. J Math Biol. 2024. PMID: 39365458 Free PMC article.
-
A review of metrics measuring dissimilarity for rooted phylogenetic networks.Brief Bioinform. 2019 Nov 27;20(6):1972-1980. doi: 10.1093/bib/bby062. Brief Bioinform. 2019. PMID: 30020404 Review.
Cited by
-
Clustering systems of phylogenetic networks.Theory Biosci. 2023 Nov;142(4):301-358. doi: 10.1007/s12064-023-00398-w. Epub 2023 Aug 12. Theory Biosci. 2023. PMID: 37573261 Free PMC article.
-
Simplifying and Characterizing DAGs and Phylogenetic Networks via Least Common Ancestor Constraints.Bull Math Biol. 2025 Feb 12;87(3):44. doi: 10.1007/s11538-025-01419-z. Bull Math Biol. 2025. PMID: 39937386 Free PMC article.
-
Merging Arcs to Produce Acyclic Phylogenetic Networks and Normal Networks.Bull Math Biol. 2022 Jan 4;84(2):26. doi: 10.1007/s11538-021-00986-1. Bull Math Biol. 2022. PMID: 34982266 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aho AV, Sagiv Y, Szymanski TG, Ullman JD (1981) Inferring a tree from lowest common ancestors with an application to the optimization of relational expressions. SIAM J Comput 10:405–421 - DOI
-
- Bickner DR (2012) On normal networks. Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
-
- Bininda-Emonds ORP (2004) The evolution of supertrees. Trends Ecol Evol 19:315–322 - DOI
-
- Bordewich M, Semple C (2016) Determining phylogenetic networks from inter-taxa distances. J Math Biol 73:283–303 - DOI
-
- Bordewich M, Huber KT, Moulton V, Semple C (2018) Recovering normal networks from shortest inter-taxa distance information. J Math Biol 77:571–594 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources