Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Apr;109(4):1034-1044.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.2044. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug Interactions of Isoniazid and Efavirenz in Pregnant Women Living With HIV in High TB Incidence Settings: Importance of Genotyping

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug Interactions of Isoniazid and Efavirenz in Pregnant Women Living With HIV in High TB Incidence Settings: Importance of Genotyping

Kamunkhwala Gausi et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

The World Health Organization guidelines recommend that individuals living with HIV receive ≥ 6 months of isoniazid preventive therapy, including pregnant women. Yet, plasma isoniazid exposure during pregnancy, in the antiretroviral therapy era, has not been well-described. We investigated pregnancy-induced and pharmacogenetic-associated pharmacokinetic changes and drug-drug interactions between isoniazid and efavirenz in pregnant women. Eight hundred forty-seven women received isoniazid for 28 weeks, either during pregnancy or at 12 weeks postpartum, and 786 women received efavirenz. After adjusting for NAT2 and CYP2B6 genotype and weight, pregnancy increased isoniazid and efavirenz clearance by 26% and 15%, respectively. Isoniazid decreased efavirenz clearance by 7% in CYP2B6 normal metabolizers and 13% in slow and intermediate metabolizers. Overall, both isoniazid and efavirenz exposures were reduced during pregnancy, but the main determinants of drug concentration were NAT2 and CYP2B6 genotypes, which resulted in a five-fold difference for both drugs between rapid and slow metabolizers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declared no competing interests for this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of the enzyme metabolizer genotypes for NAT2, CYP2B6, and CYP2A6 in the participants across the eight countries involved in the study. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of the pharmacokinetic model of both efavirenz and isoniazid. The absorption is described with a series of transit‐compartment to capture the delay in absorption, and a rate constant K a. The hepatic extraction (Eh) is responsible for both first‐pass metabolism and the systemic elimination with first‐order kinetics. V c represents the volume of distribution in the central compartment. Drug transfer between the central and peripheral compartment is defined by intercompartmental clearance Q/F, were F represents the oral bioavailability. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3
Figure 3
Isoniazid exposures stratified by NAT2 genotype and pregnancy. The box plot (with box representing median and interquartile range and whiskers the 5th‐95th interval) summarizes isoniazid maximum concentration (Cmax) on the right and 0–24‐hour area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC0–24) on the left for the three genotypes (slow, intermediate, and rapid acetylator) for both the antepartum (red solid line) and postpartum (blue dashed lines) visit. AUC0–24 was calculated by integrating between the 0 and 24 hours after dosing time points. The inset panel shows the same values on the log‐scale. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 4
Figure 4
Efavirenz exposures stratified by CYP2B6 genotype, pregnancy and isoniazid co‐administration. (a, b) Displays box plot (with box representing median and interquartile range and whiskers the 5th‐95th interval) summarizing 0–24‐hour area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC0–24) and concentrations at 12 hours postdosing (C12), respectively, for the three genotypes (slow, intermediate, and normal metabolizer) stratified by pregnancy (solid line) and postpartum (dashed lines) visit. (c, d) Stratify AUC0‐24 and C12, respectively, using INH co‐administration. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO) . Tuberculosis Report 2017 Global (Geneva, 2017) <http://apps.who.int/bookorders>.
    1. Selwyn, P.A. et al. A prospective study of the risk of tuberculosis among intravenous drug users with human immunodeficiency virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 320, 545–550 (1989). - PubMed
    1. Singh, N. & Perfect, J.R. Immune reconstitution syndrome and exacerbation of infections after pregnancy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 45, 1192–1199 (2007). - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Latent Tuberculosis Infection Updated and Consolidated Guidelines For Programmatic Management (Geneva, 2018) <https://www.who.int/tb/publications/2018/latent‐tuberculosis‐infection/en/>. - PubMed
    1. Khoo, S.H. , Gibbons, S. , Seden, K. & Back, D.J. Systematic review: drug‐drug interactions between antiretrovirals and medications used to treat TB, malaria, hepatitis B&C and opioid dependence <https://www.who.int/hiv/topics/treatment/drug_drug_interactions_review.pdf> (2014).

Publication types

MeSH terms