Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jan;51(1):45-56.
doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04803-0. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

Early life ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risks: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Early life ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risks: systematic review and meta-analysis

Kossi D Abalo et al. Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Jan.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Ionizing radiation use for medical diagnostic purposes has substantially increased over the last three decades. Moderate to high doses of radiation are well established causes of cancer, especially for exposure at young ages. However, cancer risk from low-dose medical imaging is debated.

Objective: To review the literature on cancer risks associated with prenatal and postnatal medical diagnostic ionizing radiation exposure among children and to assess this risk through a meta-analysis.

Materials and methods: A literature search of five electronic databases supplemented by a hand search was performed to retrieve relevant epidemiological studies published from 2000 to 2019, including patients younger than 22 years of age exposed to medical imaging ionizing radiation. Pooled odds ratio (ORpooled) and pooled excess relative risk (ERRpooled) representing the excess of risk per unit of organ dose were estimated with a random effect model.

Results: Twenty-four studies were included. For prenatal exposure (radiographs or CT), no significant increased risk was reported for all cancers, leukemia and brain tumors. For postnatal exposure, increased risk was observed only for CT, mostly for leukemia (ERRpooled=26.9 Gy-1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7-57.1) and brain tumors (ERRpooled=9.1 Gy-1; 95% CI: 5.2-13.1).

Conclusion: CT exposure in childhood appears to be associated with increased risk of cancer while no significant association was observed with diagnostic radiographs.

Keywords: Cancer; Children; Computed tomography; Ionizing radiation; Postnatal; Prenatal; Radiography; Risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hall EJ, Brenner DJ (2008) Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol 81:362–378 - PubMed - DOI - PMC
    1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2008) Effects of ionizing radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation—UNSCEAR 2006 report, volume 1—report to the general assembly, with scientific annexes A and B. United Nations Office at Vienna, United Nations
    1. Linet MS, Slovis TL, Miller DL et al (2012) Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures. CA Cancer J Clin 62:75–100 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN) (2015) [Exposure of the French population to ionising radiation.] Fontenay-aux-Roses. https://www.irsn.fr/FR/expertise/rapports_expertise/Documents/radioprote... . Accessed 20 Oct 2018
    1. Watson SJ, Jones AL, Oatway WB, Hughes SJ (2005) Ionising radiation exposure of the UK population: UK review. HPA-RPD-001. Health Protection Agency, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards. Chilton, Oxfordshire

LinkOut - more resources