Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1988:143:114-8.
doi: 10.3109/00365528809090229.

The effect of positive expiratory pressure versus forced expiration technique on tracheobronchial clearance in chronic bronchitics

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The effect of positive expiratory pressure versus forced expiration technique on tracheobronchial clearance in chronic bronchitics

M van Hengstum et al. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1988.

Abstract

In a randomized cross-over trial, including a control measurement the effect of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) and forced expiration technique (FET) on tracheobronchial clearance was evaluated in eight chronic bronchitics with abundant sputum production (mean, 32 g/day). PEP consisted of PEP-mask breathing interspersed with breathing exercises, huffing, and coughing. FET consisted of postural drainage, breathing exercises, huffing, and coughing. Clearance was measured with a radio-aerosol technique. At 40 min after the start of therapy the mean clearance, expressed as percentage of the amount of radioactivity present at the start of therapy, was 32% after PEP, 53% after FET, and 15% in the control run. The difference between PEP, FET, and control was statistically significant (p less than 0.02). Sputum production during PEP and FET was larger than during the equivalent period of time in the control run. It is concluded that FET is more effective than PEP in enhancing tracheobronchial clearance.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources