Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 8;17(18):6526.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186526.

Strategies and Measurement Tools in Physical Activity Promotion Interventions in the University Setting: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Strategies and Measurement Tools in Physical Activity Promotion Interventions in the University Setting: A Systematic Review

David García-Álvarez et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The university environment is especially suitable for implementing health promotion interventions and specifically for physical activity promotion among university students. The objective of this systematic review was to describe the strategies employed and the physical activity data collection tools that have been used in said interventions. A systematic search for articles was conducted using the PubMED, Cochrane, and PEDro databases. The articles selected were those describing a physical activity promotion intervention aimed at university students in their own university setting in which there was a control group. Eventually, 1074 articles were identified, of which 13 fulfilled the selection criteria. The results show eight strategies and nine different instruments for collecting physical activity data. The strategies identified were used in combination and they were adapted in each of the complex interventions. Validated questionnaires were the most widely used instrument. Future original studies are needed to find out the impact of these strategies in physical activity promotion among university students specifically in the university context.

Keywords: health promotion; healthy universities; physical activity; setting approach; students; university.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study selection process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sallis J.F., Bull F., Guthold R., Heath G.W., Inoue S., Kelly P., Oyeyemi A.L., Perez L.G., Richards J., Hallal P.C. Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium. Lancet. 2016;388:1325–1336. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30581-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guthold R., Stevens G.A., Riley L.M., Bull F.C. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1, 9 million participants. Lancet Glob. Health. 2018;6:e1077–e1086. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kohl H.W., Craig C.L., Lambert E.V., Inoue S., Alkandari J.R., Leetongin G., Kahlmeier S. The pandemic of physical inactivity: Global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380:294–305. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60898-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Telama R., Yang X., Viikari J., Välimäki I., Wanne O., Raitakari O. Physical activity from childhood to adulthood: A 21-year tracking study. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2005;28:267–273. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.12.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mechelen W.V., Twisk J.W., Post G.B., Snel J., Kemper H.C. Physical activity of young people: The Amsterdam Longitudinal Growth and Health Study. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2000;32:1610–1616. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009000-00014. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types