The FCTC dilemma on heated tobacco products
- PMID: 32912239
- PMCID: PMC7488438
- DOI: 10.1186/s12992-020-00596-x
The FCTC dilemma on heated tobacco products
Abstract
Background: In October 2018, the Conference of the Parties of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC or Convention) adopted its first decision on novel and emerging tobacco products, including heated tobacco products (HTPs). The decision remains ambiguous, e.g. by making a distinction between tobacco sticks and HTP devices. Against this background, the article seeks to answer two interrelated questions: whether and to what extent HTPs are covered by the FCTC, and whether regime provided by the Convention is suitable for their regulation.
Results: HTPs need to be classified under the FCTC as tobacco products. The distinction made by the Conference of the Parties between sticks and devices leads however to unsatisfactory results as it creates loopholes in tobacco control standards existing at the international level. A better approach, as argued in this article, is to conceptualize the notion of 'tobacco products' in functional terms as a combination of both a device and stick. While subjecting HTPs to all FCTC disciplines is, in light of our current scientific knowledge, a rational approach, such classification can be modified in the future once a sufficient amount of new evidence on their risk profile is collected. Any decision on the optimal regulatory model for HTPs will need to take into account not only health risks and potential benefits for individual users, but also the specific systemic concerns (e.g. HTPs as a gateway product). The state of scientific research is however not the only factor that will determine the fate of HTPs under the Convention. What is equally important is a conceptualization of the FCTC's objectives. If a complete eradication of the tobacco epidemic is the ultimate goal, reduced levels of risk may not be enough to justify the different (i.e. more lenient) regulatory regime for HTPs.
Conclusions: The Conference of the Parties should clarify the definition of tobacco products in light of recent changes in the market. When designing the regulatory regime for HTPs under the FCTC in the future, one has to consider not only scientific evidence but also pay attention to the objective of the Convention (or more generally to the values that underlie the current tobacco control paradigm).
Keywords: FCTC; Framework convention on tobacco control; HTP; Harm reduction; Heated tobacco products; Tobacco; Tobacco control.
Conflict of interest statement
No competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Heated tobacco product regulation under US law and the FCTC.Tob Control. 2018 Nov;27(Suppl 1):s118-s125. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054560. Epub 2018 Oct 5. Tob Control. 2018. PMID: 30291201 Free PMC article.
-
Controlling corporate influence in health policy making? An assessment of the implementation of article 5.3 of the World Health Organization framework convention on tobacco control.Global Health. 2017 Mar 8;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0234-8. Global Health. 2017. PMID: 28274267 Free PMC article.
-
FDA's reduced exposure marketing order for IQOS: why it is not a reliable global model.Tob Control. 2022 Aug;31(e1):e83-e87. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056316. Epub 2021 Apr 2. Tob Control. 2022. PMID: 33811155 Free PMC article.
-
A Scoping Review of Behavioural Studies on Heated Tobacco Products.Cureus. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):e65773. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65773. eCollection 2024 Jul. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39211653 Free PMC article.
-
[WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Article 11: packaging and labelling of tobacco products].Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2015;70(1):24-32. doi: 10.1265/jjh.70.24. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2015. PMID: 25744790 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
The commercial promotion of electronic cigarettes on social media and its influence on positive perceptions of vaping and vaping behaviours in Anglophone countries: A scoping review.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan 17;4(1):e0002736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002736. eCollection 2024. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38232105 Free PMC article.
-
Tobacco market trends in 97 countries between 2007 and 2021.Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Feb 2;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/177441. eCollection 2024. Tob Induc Dis. 2024. PMID: 38314375 Free PMC article.
-
Trade agreements and tobacco control policy: analysis of the impact of FCTC on regulatory contents of trade agreements from 2001 to 2019.Global Health. 2023 Oct 20;19(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00979-w. Global Health. 2023. PMID: 37864219 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, opened for signature June 16, 2003 (entered into force February 27, 2005) 2302 UNTS 166.
-
- See e.g. The Smoke free programs of New Zealand (https://www.smokefree.org.nz/), or England (http://www.smokefreeengland.co.uk/). Accessed 16 July 2020.
-
- Malone RE. The Race to a Tobacco Endgame. Tob Control. 2016;25:607–8. - PubMed
-
- The full list of Parties is available at http://bit.ly/2nxt0k1. Accessed 10 June 2020. Except for the European Union, all the other Parties are states.
-
- For the full list of the adopted guidelines, see www.who.int/fctc/treaty_instruments/adopted/en/. Accessed 10 June 2020.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources