Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):1380.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09473-z.

Investigating the knowledge of and public attitudes towards genetic testing within the Visegrad countries: a cross-sectional study

Klára Bíró  1 , Viktor Dombrádi  2 , Zita Fekete  3 , Gábor Bányai  2 , Klára Boruzs  2 , Attila Nagy  4 , Róza Ádány  5   6
Affiliations

Investigating the knowledge of and public attitudes towards genetic testing within the Visegrad countries: a cross-sectional study

Klára Bíró et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have investigated various factors that can determine the attitudes of the citizens considering genetic testing. However, none of them investigated how these attitudes may differ between the Visegrad countries.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study a questionnaire developed by Dutch researchers was translated and used in Hungary, Slovakia, Czechia and Poland. In each country 1000 adult citizens were asked on the topics of personal benefits regarding genetic tests, genetic determinism, and finally, the availability and usage of genetic testing. Multivariate robust regression model was created including several possible influencing factors (such as age, sex, education, marital status, religiousness, and having a genetic test within the nuclear family) to identify the possible differences between the four countries.

Results: The Hungarian citizens had the most positive opinion on the personal benefits of genetic testing followed by the Czech, Slovak and Polish. All differences were significant in this regard. Considering genetic determinism, the Slovak citizens had a significantly firmer belief in this issue compared to the Hungarians. No other significant differences were observed in this domain. On the topic of the availability and use of genetic testing the Hungarian citizens had the most accepting opinion among the four countries, followed by the Czech citizens. In this domain the Polish and Slovak answers did not differ significantly from each other.

Conclusions: Significant differences were observed even when considering various confounding effects. As the underlying reasons for these discrepancies are unknown, future studies should investigate this enigma among the four countries.

Keywords: Attitudes; Citizens; Genetic testing; Public; Visegrad countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Botkin JR, Teutsch SM, Kaye CI, Hayes M, Haddow JE, Bradley LA, et al. Outcomes of interest in evidence-based evaluations of genetic tests. Genet Med. 2010;12(4):228–35. - PubMed
    1. Dombradi V, Pitini E, van El CG, Jani A, Cornel M, Villari P, et al. Value-based genomic screening: exploring genomic screening for chronic diseases using triple value principles. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):823. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boccia S, McKee M, Adany R, Boffetta P, Burton H, Cambon-Thomsen A, et al. Beyond public health genomics: proposals from an international working group. Eur J Public Health. 2014;24(6):877–879. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biro K, Dombradi V, Jani A, Boruzs K, Gray M. Creating a common language: defining individualized, personalized and precision prevention in public health. J Public Health (Oxf) 2018;40(4):e552–e5e9. - PubMed
    1. Turnbull C, Sud A, Houlston RS. Cancer genetics, precision prevention and a call to action. Nat Genet. 2018;50(9):1212–1218. - PMC - PubMed