Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e035871.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035871.

Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)

Collaborators, Affiliations

Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)

Adriana Chebar Lozinsky et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Peanut allergy is the the most common cause of life-threatening food-induced anaphylaxis. There is currently no effective long-term treatment. There is a pressing need for definitive treatments that improve the quality of life and prevent fatalities. Allergen oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising approach, which is effective at inducing desensitisation; however, OIT has a limited ability to induce sustained unresponsiveness (SU). We have previously shown that a novel treatment comprising a combination of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 with peanut OIT (Probiotic Peanut Oral ImmunoTherapy (PPOIT)) is highly effective at inducing SU, with benefit persisting to 4 years after treatment cessation in the majority of initial treatment responders. Here we describe the protocol for a Phase IIb multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial (PPOIT-003) with dual primary objectives to evaluate the effectiveness of PPOIT at inducing SU (assessed at 8 weeks after treatment cessation) compared with placebo treatment and peanut OIT alone, in children with peanut allergy.

Methods and analysis: 200 children 1 to 10 years of age with current peanut allergy confirmed by failed double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at study screening will be recruited from three tertiary paediatric hospitals in Australia. There are three intervention arms-PPOIT, peanut OIT alone or placebo. Interventions are administered once daily for 18 months. The dual primary outcomes are: (1) the proportion of children who attain 8-week SU in the PPOIT group versus placebo group and (2) the proportion of children who attain 8-week SU in the PPOIT group versus OIT group.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees at the Royal Children's Hospital (HREC 35246) and the Child and Adolescent Health Service (RGS 2543). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated via presentations at international conferences.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12616000322437.

Keywords: allergy; clinical trials; paediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MT is a past member of Nestle Nutrition Institute Medical Advisory Board Oceania; past member of Nutricia global scientific advisory board; speaker fees from Nestle Nutrition Institute and Abbott Nutrition; consultant to Bayer Pharmaceuticals; research funding from Abbott Nutrition, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Prota Therapeutics; employee of Prota Therapeutics and inventor on a patent owned by Murdoch Children’s Research Institute ‘A method for inducing tolerance’.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study outline. DBPCFC, double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge; mths, months; OIT, oral immunotherapy; QoL, quality of life questionnaire; SPT, skin prick test.

References

    1. Gupta RS, Springston EE, Warrier MR, et al. . The prevalence, severity, and distribution of childhood food allergy in the United States. Pediatrics 2011;128:e9–17. 10.1542/peds.2011-0204 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Osborne NJ, Koplin JJ, Martin PE, et al. . Prevalence of challenge-proven IgE-mediated food allergy using population-based sampling and predetermined challenge criteria in infants. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:668–76. 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.01.039 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burks AW, Tang M, Sicherer S, et al. . ICON: food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;129:906–20. 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prescott S, Allen KJ. Food allergy: riding the second wave of the allergy epidemic. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2011;22:155–60. 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01145.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ho MHK, Wong WHS, Heine RG, et al. . Early clinical predictors of remission of peanut allergy in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;121:731–6. 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.11.024 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources