Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 27;20(3):279.
doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2017.279.

Balancing clinical risk with countertransference management protects Alliance

João F Barreto, Paula Mena Matos  1   2
Affiliations

Balancing clinical risk with countertransference management protects Alliance

João F Barreto et al. Res Psychother. .

Abstract

The working alliance has been recognized as a predictor of psychotherapy outcome across therapeutic orientations. Despite mixed findings regarding the effect of problem severity on the alliance formation, there is evidence suggesting that therapist factors may interfere in this association. This study examined how clients' baseline clinical features affected the early alliance and the possible role of therapists' countertransference management as a mediator. Thirteen therapeutic dyads were assessed at 2 different time points. Clients' clinical dimensions were assessed prior to the 2nd session, and therapists' countertransference management and clients' ratings of the alliance were measured after the 2nd session. Positive associations were found between clients' subjective wellbeing, social functioning, risk, and global psychological distress and countertransference management dimensions and total score. Empathy-based countertransference management suppressed the negative impact of clinical risk on alliance. Our findings suggest that clinical problems activate countertransference management, which in turn may buffer their negative effect on alliance.

Keywords: Countertransference management; Suppressor effect; Therapeutic alliance; Working alliance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: the authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Standardized regression coefficients for the effect of clinical risk on alliance suppressed by countertransference management. CFI=countertransference factors inventory – direct; CFI Empat=empathy subscale of the CFI; CORE Risk=risk subscale of the clinical outcomes in routine evaluation – outcome measure; WAI-SR=working alliance inventory – short revised; WAI Bond=bond subscale of the WAI; WAI T/G=tasks/goals subscale of the WAI.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ackerman S.J. Hilsenroth M.J., (2001). A review of therapist characteristics and techniques negatively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38, 171-185.
    1. Ackerman S.J. Hilsenroth M.J., (2003). A review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Clinical Psychological Review, 23, 1-33. - PubMed
    1. Barreto J.F. Carvalho H.M. Matos P.M., (2014). Inventario de Factores da Contratransferencia – Versão Portuguesa [Countertransference Factors Inventory – Portuguese version]. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Psychology at University of Porto, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
    1. Bucci S. Seymour-Hide A. Harris A. Berry K., (2015). Client and therapist attachment styles and working alliance. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, doi: 10.1002/cpp.1944 - PubMed
    1. Clarkin J.F. Yeomans F.E. Kernberg O.F., (2006). Psychotherapy of borderline personality: Focusing on object relations. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

LinkOut - more resources