Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Jan;197(1):8-18.
doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01680-2. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

R0 resection following chemo (radio)therapy improves survival of primary inoperable pancreatic cancer patients. Interim results of the German randomized CONKO-007± trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

R0 resection following chemo (radio)therapy improves survival of primary inoperable pancreatic cancer patients. Interim results of the German randomized CONKO-007± trial

R Fietkau et al. Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: Chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy is the standard in patients with initially nonmetastatic unresectable pancreatic cancer. Additional surgery is in discussion. The CONKO-007 multicenter randomized trial examines the value of radiotherapy. Our interim analysis showed a significant effect of surgery, which may be relevant to clinical practice.

Methods: One hundred eighty patients received induction chemotherapy (gemcitabine or FOLFIRINOX). Patients without tumor progression were randomized to either chemotherapy alone or to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. At the end of therapy, a panel of five independent pancreatic surgeons judged the resectability of the tumor.

Results: Following induction chemotherapy, 126/180 patients (70.0%) were randomized to further treatment. Following study treatment, 36/126 patients (28.5%) underwent surgery; (R0: 25/126 [19.8%]; R1/R2/Rx [n = 11/126; 6.1%]). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better for patients with R0 resected tumors (median DFS and OS: 16.6 months and 26.5 months, respectively) than for nonoperated patients (median DFS and OS: 11.9 months and 16.5 months, respectively; p = 0.003). In the 25 patients with R0 resected tumors before treatment, only 6/113 (5.3%) of the recommendations of the panel surgeons recommended R0 resectability, compared with 17/48 (35.4%) after treatment (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Tumor resectability of pancreatic cancer staged as unresectable at primary diagnosis should be reassessed after neoadjuvant treatment. The patient should undergo surgery if a resectability is reached, as this significantly improves their prognosis.

Keywords: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Prospective randomized multicenter trial; Surgery; Tumor resectability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

R. Fietkau, R. Grützmann, U.A. Wittel, R.S. Croner, L. Jacobasch, U.P. Neumann, A. Reinacher-Schick, D. Imhoff, S. Boeck, L. Keilholz, H. Oettle, W.M. Hohenberger, H. Golcher, W.O. Bechstein, W. Uhl, A. Pirkl, W. Adler, S. Semrau, S. Rutzner, M. Ghadimi, and D. Lubgan declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trial schedule including study inclusion, evaluation for resectability, induction chemotherapy, randomization, therapy after randomization, and subsequent evaluation of resectability at the end of the trial
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT diagram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Disease-free survival rates of randomized patients (n = 126): R0-resected patients (green curve) in relation to R1/R2/Rx-resected patients (red curve) and patients without surgery (black curve). Median survival rates are given in months
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Overall survival rates of randomized patients (n = 126): R0-resected patients (green curve) in relation to R1/R2/Rx-resected patients (red curve) and patients without surgery (black curve). Median survival rates are given in months

Comment in

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jema A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(1):5–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lutz MP, Zalcberg JR, Ducreux M, Aust D, Bruno MJ, Buchler MW, Delpero JR, Gloor B, Glynne-Jones R, Hartwig W, et al. 3rd St. Gallen EORTC Gastrointestinal Cancer Conference: Consensus recommendations on controversial issues in the primary treatment of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2017;79:41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, Asbun H, Bain A, Behrman SW, Benson AB, 3rd, Binder E, Cardin DB, Cha C, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(8):1028–1061. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0131. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhayani NH, Enomoto LM, James BC, Ortenzi G, Kaifi JT, Kimchi ET, Staveley-O’Carroll KF, Gusani NJ. Multivisceral and extended resections during pancreatoduodenectomy increase morbidity and mortality. Surgery. 2014;155(3):567–574. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petrucciani N, Debs T, Nigri G, Giannini G, Sborlini E, Kassir R, Ben Amor I, Iannelli A, Valabrega S, D’Angelo F, et al. Pancreatectomy combined with multivisceral resection for pancreatic malignancies: is it justified? Results of a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 2018;20(1):3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.08.002. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms