Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;64(11):881-894.
doi: 10.1111/jir.12774. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

Shared decision-making with people with intellectual disabilities in the last phase of life: A scoping review

H W Noorlandt  1 , M A Echteld  2   3 , I Tuffrey-Wijne  4 , D A M Festen  5 , C Vrijmoeth  6 , A van der Heide  1 , I J Korfage  1
Affiliations

Shared decision-making with people with intellectual disabilities in the last phase of life: A scoping review

H W Noorlandt et al. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) is the process in which healthcare professionals and patients jointly discuss and decide which care and treatment policy is to be followed. The importance of SDM is increasingly being recognised across health settings, including palliative care. Little is known about SDM with people with intellectual disabilities (IDs) in the last phase of life. This review aimed to explore to which extent and in which way people with ID in the last phase of life are involved in decision-making about their care and treatment.

Method: In this scoping review, we systematically searched in the Embase, Medline and PsycINFO databases for empirical studies on decision-making with people with ID in the last phase of life.

Results: Of a total of 281 identified titles and abstracts, 10 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All focused on medical end-of-life decisions, such as foregoing life-sustaining treatment, do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders or palliative sedation. All studies emphasise the relevance of involving people with ID themselves, or at least their relatives, in making decisions at the end of life. Still, only two papers described processes of decision-making in which persons with ID actively participated. Furthermore, in only one paper, best practices and guidelines for decision-making in palliative care for people with ID were defined.

Conclusion: Although the importance of involving people with ID in the decision-making process is emphasised, best practices or guidelines about what this should look like are lacking. We recommend developing aids that specifically support SDM with people with ID in the last phase of life.

Keywords: decision-making; end-of-life; intellectual disabilities; palliative phase; scoping review; shared decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bekkema N., de Veer A. J., Hertogh C. M. & Francke A. L. (2015) ‘From activating towards caring’: shifts in care approaches at the end of life of people with intellectual disabilities; a qualitative study of the perspectives of relatives, care-staff and physicians. BMC Palliative Care 14, 33-43.
    1. Charles C., Gafni A. & Whelan T. (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine 44, 681-692.
    1. Charles C., Gafni A. & Whelan T. (1999) Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science & Medicine 49, 651-661.
    1. Colquhoun H. L., Levac D., O'Brien K. K., Straus S., Tricco A. C., Perrier L. et al. (2014) Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 67, 1291-1294.
    1. Elwyn G., Frosch D., Thomson R., Joseph-Williams N., Lloyd A., Kinnersley P. et al. (2012) Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine 27, 1361-1367.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources