Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Apr 23;117(5):1382-1390.
doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa204.

The impact of aircraft noise on vascular and cardiac function in relation to noise event number: a randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The impact of aircraft noise on vascular and cardiac function in relation to noise event number: a randomized trial

Frank P Schmidt et al. Cardiovasc Res. .

Abstract

Aims: Nighttime aircraft noise exposure has been associated with increased risk of hypertension and myocardial infarction, mechanistically linked to sleep disturbance, stress, and endothelial dysfunction. It is unclear, whether the most widely used metric to determine noise exposure, equivalent continuous sound level (Leq), is an adequate indicator of the cardiovascular impact induced by different noise patterns.

Methods and results: In a randomized crossover study, we exposed 70 individuals with established cardiovascular disease or increased cardiovascular risk to two aircraft noise scenarios and one control scenario. Polygraphic recordings, echocardiography, and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) were determined for three study nights. The noise patterns consisted of 60 (Noise60) and 120 (Noise120) noise events, respectively, but with comparable Leq, corresponding to a mean value of 45 dB. Mean value of noise during control nights was 37 dB. During the control night, FMD was 10.02 ± 3.75%, compared to 7.27 ± 3.21% for Noise60 nights and 7.21 ± 3.58% for Noise120 nights (P < 0.001). Sleep quality was impaired after noise exposure in both noise scenario nights (P < 0.001). Serial echocardiographic assessment demonstrated an increase in the E/E' ratio, a measure of diastolic function, within the three exposure nights, with a ratio of 6.83 ± 2.26 for the control night, 7.21 ± 2.33 for Noise60 and 7.83 ± 3.07 for Noise120 (P = 0.043).

Conclusions: Nighttime exposure to aircraft noise with similar Leq, but different number of noise events, results in a comparable worsening of vascular function. Adverse effects of nighttime aircraft noise exposure on cardiac function (diastolic dysfunction) seemed stronger the higher number of noise events.

Keywords: Aircraft noise exposure; Cardiac function; Environmental health; Flow-mediated dilation; Sleep disturbance; Vascular function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Sleep quality as reported after each study night on a 0–10 visual analogue scale with higher values indicating impaired sleep quality, depicted as scatter plots with mean ± standard deviation. P-values from a repeated measures non-parametric Friedman test with Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons (normality test failed) for 70 participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Vascular function as assessed by means of flow-mediated dilation after each study night, depicted as scatter plots with mean ± standard deviation and P-values from a repeated measures non-parametric Friedman test with Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons (normality test failed) for 70 participants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
FMD values (%) for the study nights with 60 and 120 noise events on x and y axis for 70 participants.
Figure 4
Figure 4
E/E′ ratio after each study night, depicted as scatter plots with mean ± standard deviation and P-values from a repeated measures non-parametric Friedman test with Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons (normality test failed) for 63 participants (7 excluded values as not all repeated measures for Control, Noise60, and Noise120 nights were available).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Münzel T, Herzog J, Schmidt FP, Sørensen M.. Environmental stressors and cardiovascular disease: the evidence is growing. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2297–2299. - PubMed
    1. Seidler A, Wagner M, Schubert M, Dröge P, Römer K, Pons-Kühnemann J, Swart E, Zeeb H, Hegewald J.. Aircraft, road and railway traffic noise as risk factors for heart failure and hypertensive heart disease—a case-control study based on secondary data. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2016;219:749–758. - PubMed
    1. Kwak KM, Ju YS, Kwon YJ, Chung YK, Kim BK, Kim H, Youn K.. The effect of aircraft noise on sleep disturbance among the residents near a civilian airport: a cross-sectional study. Ann Occup Environ Med 2016;28:38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foraster M, Eze IC, Schaffner E, Vienneau D, Héritier H, Endes S, Rudzik F, Thiesse L, Pieren R, Schindler C, Schmidt-Trucksäss A, Brink M, Cajochen C, Marc Wunderli J, Röösli M, Probst-Hensch N.. Exposure to road, railway, and aircraft noise and arterial stiffness in the SAPALDIA study: annual average noise levels and temporal noise characteristics. Environ Health Perspect 2017;125:097004. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beutel ME, Junger C, Klein EM, Wild P, Lackner K, Blettner M, Binder H, Michal M, Wiltink J, Brahler E, Munzel T.. Noise annoyance is associated with depression and anxiety in the general population—the contribution of aircraft noise. PLoS One 2016;11:e0155357. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms