Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Feb;53(2):481-490.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.27348. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

Shoulder MR Arthrography: Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Contrast Injection Techniques Using an Anterior Approach

Abeer H Ali  1 , Hatem G Said  2 , Eman Abo Elhamd  1 , Mohammad K Mahmoud  1 , Omran K Qenawy  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Shoulder MR Arthrography: Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Contrast Injection Techniques Using an Anterior Approach

Abeer H Ali et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Background: MR arthrography (MRA) is commonly used in the assessment of shoulder internal derangements. Correct intra-articular contrast injection is required for this modality. Anterior injections under fluoroscopic, ultrasound-guidance, or without image-guidance have been described in the literature. However, no simultaneous comparison has been performed between the three techniques.

Purpose: To compare the accuracy and performance of fluoroscopy (FL)-guided, ultrasound (US)-guided and non-image-guided intra-articular contrast injection via an anterior approach for performing shoulder MRA.

Study type: Prospective.

Subjects: Two-hundred and ten patients (180 men and 30 women; mean age, 33 ± 12 years; range 20-60 years) with clinically suspected shoulder pathology.

Field strength/sequence: 1.5T/fat-suppressed T1 -weighted, T2 -weighted, and 3D-gradient-echo images.

Assessment: Patients underwent shoulder MRA after anterior intra-articular contrast injection under FL- or US-guidance or without image-guidance. Patients were randomized among the three techniques with each group comprising 70. The techniques were compared according to the accuracy of intra-articular needle placement, attempts success rate, pain during and 24 hours after injection, procedure times, contrast extravasation rate, joint distension, and MRA diagnostic efficacy. Pain was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) pain-score.

Statistical tests: Pearson's chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Results: FL- and US-guided injections (100% accuracy) were significantly more accurate than non-image-guided (85.7% accuracy) (P < 0.05). US-guidance was the least painful, with statistical differences between image-guided and non-image-guided techniques regarding the first attempt success rate (95.7% and 92.8% for FL- and US-guided vs. 78.6% for blinded), VAS-score 24 hours-post-procedure (1.7 ± 1.7, and 1.5 ± 1.4 vs. 2.2 ± 1.4), procedure time (11.9 ± 1.6, and 7.4 ± 1.7 vs. 4.3 ± 0.76 minutes), and contrast extravasation rate (5.7%, and 8.6% vs. 30%) (all P < 0.05). Procedure time was also significantly different between FL and US-guidance (P < 0.05).

Data conclusion: Imaging-guided injections are more accurate and tolerable than non-image-guided and should be considered to confirm intra-articular needle position, hence adequate capsular distension and good diagnostic quality of shoulder MRA. US guidance is a less painful, rapid, and safe alternative to the FL approach. Evidence Level: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 5. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2021;53:481-490.

Keywords: fluoroscopy; non-image-guided; shoulder MRA; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bencardino JT, Beltran J, Rosenberg ZS, et al. Superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions: Diagnosis with MR arthrography of the shoulder. Radiology 2000;214(1):267-271.
    1. De Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Nazarian LN. Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: A meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(6):1701-1707.
    1. Fotiadou A, Drevelegas A, Nasuto M, Guglielmi G. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder in the evaluation of anteroinferior labrum abnormalities: A prospective study. Insights Imaging 2013;4(2):157-162.
    1. Schaeffeler C, Waldt S, Holzapfel K, et al. Lesions of the biceps pulley: Diagnostic accuracy of MR arthrography of the shoulder and evaluation of previously described and new diagnostic signs. Radiology 2012;264(2):504-513.
    1. Dépelteau H, Bureau NJ, Cardinal E, Aubin B, Brassard P. Arthrography of the shoulder: A simple fluoroscopically guided approach for targeting the rotator cuff interval. Am J Roentgenol 2004;182(2):329-332.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources