Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct;15(10):2580-2599.
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12792. Epub 2020 Sep 19.

Advances in optical gastrointestinal endoscopy: a technical review

Affiliations
Review

Advances in optical gastrointestinal endoscopy: a technical review

Yubo Tang et al. Mol Oncol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Optical endoscopy is the primary diagnostic and therapeutic tool for management of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Most GI neoplasms arise from precancerous lesions; thus, technical innovations to improve detection and diagnosis of precancerous lesions and early cancers play a pivotal role in improving outcomes. Over the last few decades, the field of GI endoscopy has witnessed enormous and focused efforts to develop and translate accurate, user-friendly, and minimally invasive optical imaging modalities. From a technical point of view, a wide range of novel optical techniques is now available to probe different aspects of light-tissue interaction at macroscopic and microscopic scales, complementing white light endoscopy. Most of these new modalities have been successfully validated and translated to routine clinical practice. Herein, we provide a technical review of the current status of existing and promising new optical endoscopic imaging technologies for GI cancer screening and surveillance. We summarize the underlying principles of light-tissue interaction, the imaging performance at different scales, and highlight what is known about clinical applicability and effectiveness. Furthermore, we discuss recent discovery and translation of novel molecular probes that have shown promise to augment endoscopists' ability to diagnose GI lesions with high specificity. We also review and discuss the role and potential clinical integration of artificial intelligence-based algorithms to provide decision support in real time. Finally, we provide perspectives on future technology development and its potential to transform endoscopic GI cancer detection and diagnosis.

Keywords: gastrointestinal tract; machine learning; molecular probe; optical endoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Optical endoscopic techniques for macroscopic and microscopic imaging of the GI mucosa. Existing macroscopic modalities include high‐definition endoscopy, ultrathin endoscopy, and capsule endoscopy. Microscopic resolution can be achieved using OCT, endocytoscopy, CLE, and HRME. Reproduced from [66, 81, 136] with permission from Elsevier (white light and chromoendoscope, capsule endoscope, and endocytoscopy, respectively), from [55] with permission from John Wiley and Sons (ultrathin endoscope), from [137] by permission from Springer Nature (OCT), from [69] with permission from © Georg Thieme Verlag KG (CLE).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Examples of capsule‐, balloon‐, and probe‐based optical endoscopic systems. (A) Capsule endoscopes (MicroCam and PillCam). (B) VLE probe within an inflated balloon catheter. (C) Confocal laser endomicroscope through a biopsy channel. (D) A low‐cost HRME with integrated diagnostic software. Figure 2B–D reproduced from [97, 138, 139] with permission from Elsevier.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Examples of computer‐aided algorithms for detection and diagnosis of colorectal polyps. (A) In microscopic images of polyps collected with endocytoscopy, clinically inspired nuclear morphology features were extracted and quantified for diagnosing advanced histology. (B) A data‐driven algorithm is trained using a convolutional neural network to highlight adenomatous CRC polyps in WLE images. Figure 3A reproduced from [134] with permission from Elsevier. Figure 3Breproduced from [125] with permission from BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA & Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68, 394–424. - PubMed
    1. Codipilly DC, Qin Y, Dawsey SM, Kisiel J, Topazian M, Ahlquist D & Iyer PG (2018) Screening for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: recent advances. Gastrointest Endosc 88, 413–426. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mwachiro MM, Burgert SL, Lando J, Chepkwony R, Bett C, Bosire C, Abnet CC, Githanga J, Waweru W, Giffen CAet al. (2016) Esophageal squamous dysplasia is common in asymptomatic kenyans: a prospective, community‐based, cross‐sectional study. Am J Gastroenterol 111, 500–507. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dawsey SM, Fleischer DE, Wang G‐Q, Zhou B, Kidwell JA, Lu N, Lewin KJ, Roth MJ, Tio TL & Taylor PR (1998) Mucosal iodine staining improves endoscopic visualization of squamous dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus in linxian, china. Cancer 83, 220–231. - PubMed
    1. Hur C, Miller M, Kong CY, Dowling EC, Nattinger KJ, Dunn M & Feuer EJ (2013) Trends in esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality. Cancer 119, 1149–1158. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms