Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 9;21(18):6595.
doi: 10.3390/ijms21186595.

Improved Detection of Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 by Microsphere-Based Antibody Assay

Affiliations

Improved Detection of Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 by Microsphere-Based Antibody Assay

Carol Ho-Yan Fong et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Currently available COVID-19 antibody tests using enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or immunochromatographic assay have variable sensitivity and specificity. Here, we developed and evaluated a novel microsphere-based antibody assay (MBA) for detecting immunoglobulin G (IgG) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleoprotein (NP) and spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD). The seropositive cutoff value was set using a cohort of 294 anonymous serum specimens collected in 2018. The specificity was assessed using serum specimens collected from organ donors or influenza patients before 2020. Seropositive rate was determined among COVID-19 patients. Time-to-seropositivity and signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) ratio were compared between MBA and EIA. MBA had a specificity of 100% (93/93; 95% confidence interval (CI), 96-100%) for anti-NP IgG, 98.9% (92/93; 95% CI 94.2-100%) for anti-RBD IgG. The MBA seropositive rate for convalescent COVID-19 patients was 89.8% (35/39) for anti-NP IgG and 79.5% (31/39) for anti-RBD IgG. The time-to-seropositivity was shorter with MBA than EIA. MBA could better differentiate between COVID-19 patients and negative controls with higher S/CO ratio for COVID-19 patients, lower S/CO ratio with negative controls and fewer specimens in the equivocal range. MBA is robust, simple and is suitable for clinical microbiology laboratory for the accurate determination of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies for diagnosis, serosurveillance, and vaccine trials.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antibody assay; flow cytometry; serology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Determination of optimal microsphere-protein molar ratio for microsphere-based assay. Serum from a COVID-19 patient was used. The mean fluorescent intensity at different microsphere-protein molar ratio are shown for (A) nucleoprotein (NP) and (B) receptor binding domain (RBD), and the corresponding stacked histogram of selected microsphere-protein molar ratio are shown in (C) NP (1:2) and (D) RBD (1:1). Experiment was performed in triplicate with serum specimen collected from 3 different COVID-19 patients and a representative graph is shown. Error bar represents the standard error of mean from 3 replicates.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dynamic range of microsphere-based antibody assay (MBA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for (A) NP, and (B) RBD. Serial dilutions of COVID-19 serum were used to detect anti-NP IgG and anti-RBD IgG with MBA and EIA. Experiment was performed with n = 3 and a representative graph is shown. Error bar represents the standard error of mean from 3 replicates.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A,B) Comparison of MFI between 39 COVID-19 patients, 40 influenza patients, and 53 organ donors for (A) NP and (B) RBD. (C,D) Comparison of OD values between COVID-19 patients, influenza patients, and organ donors for (C) NP and (D) RBD.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cumulative count of seropositive COVID-19 patient specimens detected by MBA and EIA.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) ratio between MBA and EIA for the serum specimens collected during the convalescent phase of 39 patients. **** p ≤ 0.0001.

References

    1. Peiris J.S.M., Lai S.T., Poon L.L.M., Guan Y., Yam L.Y.C., Lim W., Nicholls J., Yee W.K.S., Yan W.W., Cheung M.T., et al. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003;361:1319–1325. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13077-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng V.C., Lau S.K., Woo P.C., Yuen K.Y. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007;20:660–694. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00023-07. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan J.F., Yuan S., Kok K.H., To K.K., Chu H., Yang J., Xing F., Liu J., Yip C.C., Poon R.W., et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: A study of a family cluster. Lancet. 2020;395:514–523. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. To K.K., Tsang O.T., Chik-Yan Yip C., Chan K.H., Wu T.C., Chan J.M.C., Leung W.S., Chik T.S., Choi C.Y., Kandamby D.H., et al. Consistent detection of 2019 novel coronavirus in saliva. Clin. Infect. Dis. :2020. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa149. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. To K.K.-W., Cheng V.C.-C., Cai J., Chan K., Chen L., Wong L., Choi C.Y., Fong C.H., Ng A.C., Lu L., et al. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and our returnees evacuated from Hubei province of China: A multi-cohort study. Lancet Microbe. 2020;1:e111–e118. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30053-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources