Patient-maintained propofol sedation for adult patients undergoing surgical or medical procedures: a scoping review of current evidence and technology
- PMID: 32917377
- PMCID: PMC7844373
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.07.053
Patient-maintained propofol sedation for adult patients undergoing surgical or medical procedures: a scoping review of current evidence and technology
Abstract
Patient-maintained propofol sedation (PMPS) is the delivery of procedural propofol sedation by target-controlled infusion with the patient exerting an element of control over their target-site propofol concentration. This scoping review aims to establish the extent and nature of current knowledge regarding PMPS from both a clinical and technological perspective, thereby identifying knowledge gaps to guide future research. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and OpenGrey databases, identifying 17 clinical studies for analysis. PMPS is described in the context of healthy volunteers and in orthopaedic, general surgical, dental, and endoscopic clinical settings. All studies used modifications to existing commercially-available infusion devices to achieve prototype systems capable of PMPS. The current literature precludes rigorous generalisable conclusions regarding the safety or comparative clinical effectiveness of PMPS, however cautious acknowledgement of efficacy in specific clinical settings is appropriate. Based on the existing literature, together with new standardised outcome reporting recommendations for sedation research and frameworks designed to assess novel health technologies research, we have made recommendations for future pharmacological, clinical, behavioural, and health economic research on PMPS. We conclude that high-quality experimental clinical trials with relevant comparator groups assessing the impact of PMPS on standardised patient-orientated outcome measures are urgently required.
Keywords: anxiolytic; conscious sedation; equipment design; hypnotics; propofol; sedatives; target-controlled infusion.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Sury M.R.J., Palmer J.H.M.G., Cook T.M., Pandit J.J. The state of UK anaesthesia: a survey of National Health Service activity in 2013. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:575–584. - PubMed
-
- Myles P.S., Grocott M.P.W., Boney O. Standardizing end points in perioperative trials: towards a core and extended outcome set. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116:586–589. - PubMed
-
- Goudra B., Singh P.M. Failure of Sedasys: destiny or poor design? Anesth Analg. 2017;124:686–688. - PubMed
-
- Tricco A.C., Lillie E., Zarin W. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–473. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources