Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jan;36(1):1-5.
doi: 10.1002/hup.2757. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

Blinding and bias in a hypnotic clinical trial

William V McCall  1 , Ruth M Benca  2 , Meredith E Rumble  3 , Andrew D Krystal  4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Blinding and bias in a hypnotic clinical trial

William V McCall et al. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: Information is lacking regarding how commonly unblinding of treatment assignment occurs in hypnotic randomized clinic trials (RCTs). We now report the "best guesses" of clinical trial participants, versus study coordinators, versus study physicians in the study Reducing Suicidal Ideation Through Insomnia Treatment (REST-IT).

Methods: REST-IT, a, 8-week double-blind RCT, compared zolpidem extended-release (ER) versus placebo at bedtime in 103 adults with major depressive disorder with insomnia and suicidal ideation, and who received open label selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. At the conclusion of study participation, 89 of the participants in this study, the study coordinators, and the study physicians each independently recorded their "best guess" of the treatment assigned.

Results: Patients guessed correctly 58.4% of the time, coordinators 53.9% of the time, and physicians 49.4% of the time, and none were different from chance alone. Agreement between patient/coordinator, patient/doctor, and coordinator/doctor dyads were 75%-78% with no significant differences in agreement between the dyads.

Conclusions: "Best guesses" of all parties were not different from chance, suggesting that the blind was maintained and that assessment bias was minimized in this RCT of zolpidem ER versus placebo. Our results may not apply to other hypnotics or other RCT designs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01689909.

Keywords: CONSORT; best guess; bias; blinding; randomized clinical trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES
    1. Altman, D., Schulz, K., Moher, D., Egger, M., Davidoff, F., Elbourne, D., … Lang, T. (2001). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134, 663-694.
    1. Bang, H., Ni, L., & Davis, C. (2004). Assessment of blinding in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 25, 143-156.
    1. Bastien, C. H., Vallieres, A., & Morin, C. M. (2001). Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Medicine, 2, 297-307.
    1. Beck, A. T., Kovacs, M., & Weissman, A. (1979). Assessment of suicidal intention: The scale for suicide ideation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 343-352.
    1. Begg, C., Cho, M., Eastwood, S., Horton, R., Moher, D., Olkin, L., … Stroup, D. F. (1996). Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 637-639.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data