Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;36(5):1164-1179.
doi: 10.1111/jgh.15255. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

Artificial liver support systems

Affiliations

Artificial liver support systems

Radhika Tandon et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 May.

Abstract

Artificial liver systems are used to bridge between transplantation or to allow a patient's liver to recover. They are used in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure. There are five artificial systems currently in use: molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD), Prometheus, selective plasma filtration therapy, and hemodiafiltration. The aim is to compare existing data on the efficiency of these devices. A literature search was conducted using online libraries. Inclusion criteria included randomized control trials or comparative human studies published after the year 2000. A systematic review was conducted for the five individual devices with a more detailed comparison of the biochemistry for the SPAD and MARS systems. Eighty-nine patients were involved in the review comparing SPAD and MARS. Results showed that there was an average reduction in bilirubin (-53 μmol/L in MARS and -50 μmol/L in SPAD), creatinine (-19.5 μmol/L in MARS and -7.5 μmol/L in SPAD), urea (-0.9 mmol/L in MARS and -0.75 mmol/L in SPAD), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (-0.215 μmol/L·s in MARS and -0.295 μmol/L·s in SPAD) in both SPAD and MARS. However, there was no significant difference between the changes in the two systems. This review demonstrated that both MARS and SPAD aid recovery of ALF. There is no difference between the efficiency of MARS and SPAD. Because of the limited data, there is a need for more randomized control trials. Evaluating cost and patient preference would aid in differentiating the systems.

Keywords: artificial; extracorporeal circulation; liver; transplant.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Trefts E, Gannon M, Wasserman DH. The Liver. Curr. Biol. 2017; 27: r1147-r1151.
    1. Figaro S, Pereira U, Dumé A-S et al. SUPPLIVER: bioartifical supply for liver failure. IRBM 2015; 36: 101-109 *An excellent study of the liver and how bioartificial liver devices are developed and tested.
    1. Bernal W, Wendon J. Acute liver failure. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013; 369: 2525-2534.
    1. Abbas Z, Shazi L. Pattern and profile of chronic liver disease in acute on chronic liver failure. Hepatology International. 2015; 9: 366-372.
    1. Chan AC, Fan ST, Lo CM et al. Liver transplantation from acute on chronic liver failure. Hepatol Int. 2009; 3: 571-581.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources