Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;110(Pt 2):104706.
doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104706. Epub 2020 Sep 4.

Screening for economic hardship for child welfare-involved families during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid partnership response

Barbara Fallon  1 , Rachael Lefebvre  2 , Delphine Collin-Vézina  3 , Emmaline Houston  2 , Nicolette Joh-Carnella  2 , Tina Malti  4 , Joanne Filippelli  2 , Kate Schumaker  5 , Wendy Manel  5 , Mark Kartusch  5 , Scottye Cash  6
Affiliations

Screening for economic hardship for child welfare-involved families during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid partnership response

Barbara Fallon et al. Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Pandemics have a wide range of economic, health and social consequences related to both the spread of a disease and efforts made by government leaders to contain it which may be particularly detrimental for the child welfare-involved population. This is because child welfare agencies serve some of the highest needs children and families. A significant proportion of these families face economic hardship, and as a result of containment measures for COVID-19, more families inevitably will.

Objective: Given the range of negative consequences related to the pandemic and the evolving supports available to families, child protection workers needed a clinical tool to guide and support work with families informed by an understanding of economic hardship. The objective of this paper is to report on the development and implementation strategy of a tool to be used for practice intervention during the pandemic.

Methods: Action research methodology was utilized in the creation of the clinical tool. The tool's development and implementation occurred through an academic/child welfare sector partnership involving child welfare agencies representing diverse regions and populations in Ontario, Canada. Factor analysis of representative child welfare data from the Ontario Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect 2018 (OIS-2018) on economic hardship was used to inform the development of questions on the clinical tool.

Results: The development and implementation strategy of the clinical tool are described, including the results from analyses of the OIS-2018.

Conclusions: Future directions for the project are discussed, including considerations for using this tool beyond the pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19; Child protection; Clinical tools; Economic hardship; Ontario.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no declarations of interest.

References

    1. Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action . 2019. Minimum standards for child protection in humanitarian action.https://alliancecpha.org/system/tdf/library/attachments/cpms_2019_final_... file=1&type=node&id=35094.
    1. Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action . 2019. Technical note: Protection of children during the coronavirus pandemic, version 1. https://alliancecpha.org/system/tdf/library/attachments/the_alliance_cov... ief_version_1.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=37184.
    1. Bartholomew D. Factor analysis for categorical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1980;42(3):293–321. www.jstor.org/stable/2985165
    1. Bilson A., Martin K.E.C. Referrals and child protection in England: One in five children referred to children’s services and one in nineteen investigated before the age of five. British Journal of Social Work. 2016;47(3):793–811.
    1. Black D.A., Smith Slepp A.M., Heyman R.E. Risk factors for child pyschological abuse. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2001;6(2–3):189–201.

Publication types