Trunk, pelvic and hip kinematics during the Stork test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain, asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women
- PMID: 32920251
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105168
Trunk, pelvic and hip kinematics during the Stork test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain, asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women
Abstract
Background: Pelvic girdle pain is prevalent during pregnancy, and women affected report weight-bearing activities to be their main disability. The Stork test is a commonly used single-leg-stance test. As clinicians report specific movement patterns in those with pelvic girdle pain, we aimed to investigate the influence of both pregnancy and pelvic girdle pain on performance of the Stork test.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 25 pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain, 23 asymptomatic pregnant and 24 asymptomatic non-pregnant women underwent three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the Stork test. Linear mixed models were used to investigate between-group differences in trunk, pelvic and hip kinematics during neutral stance, weight shift, leg lift and single leg stance.
Findings: Few and small significant between-group differences were found. Pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain had significantly less hip adduction during single leg stance compared to asymptomatic pregnant women (estimated marginal means (95% confidence intervals) -1.1° (-2.4°, 0.3°) and 1.0° (-0.4°, 2.4°), respectively; P = 0.03). Asymptomatic pregnant women had significantly less hip internal rotation compared to non-pregnant women 4.1° (1.6°, 6.7°) and 7.9° (5.4°, 10.4°), respectively (P = 0.04) and greater peak hip flexion angle of the lifted leg in single leg stance 80.4° (77.0°, 83.9°) and 74.1° (70.8°, 77.5°), respectively (P = 0.01). Variation in key kinematic variables was large across participants in all three groups.
Interpretation: Our findings indicate that trunk, pelvic and hip movements during the Stork test are not specific to pregnancy and/or pelvic girdle pain in the 2nd trimester. Instead, movement strategies appear unique to each individual.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Kinematic and spatiotemporal gait characteristics in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain, asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 Aug;68:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.05.030. Epub 2019 May 23. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019. PMID: 31158589
-
Kinematic and Kinetic Analysis of the Single-Leg Triple Hop Test in Women With and Without Patellofemoral Pain.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Oct;45(10):799-807. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5011. Epub 2015 Aug 24. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015. PMID: 26304640
-
The Timed Up & Go test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain compared to asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women.Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Oct;43:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 21. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019. PMID: 31076336
-
Spatiotemporal gait changes in healthy pregnant women and women with pelvic girdle pain: A systematic review.J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(5):821-838. doi: 10.3233/BMR-170828. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018. PMID: 29865027
-
Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: an update.BMC Med. 2011 Feb 15;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-15. BMC Med. 2011. PMID: 21324134 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Home-Based Tele-Pilates Intervention on Pregnant Women: A Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jan 8;10(1):125. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010125. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35052289 Free PMC article.
-
The Relationship Between the NSP and the Individual and Work Organizational Variables: A Cross-Sectional Study.Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 31;10:726826. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.726826. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35433581 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials