Sex differences in quality of life after stroke were explained by patient factors, not clinical care: evidence from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry
- PMID: 32920917
- DOI: 10.1111/ene.14531
Sex differences in quality of life after stroke were explained by patient factors, not clinical care: evidence from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry
Abstract
Background and purpose: Women may receive stroke care less often than men. We examined the contribution of clinical care on sex differences and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after stroke.
Methods: We included first-ever strokes registered in the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (2010-2014) with HRQoL assessed between 90 and 180 days after onset (EQ-5D-3L instrument) that were linked to hospital administrative data (up to 2013). Study factors included sociodemographics, comorbidities, walking ability on admission (stroke severity proxy) and clinical care (e.g. stroke unit care). Responses to the EQ-5D-3L were transformed into a total utility value (-0.516 'worse than death' to 1 'best' health). Quantile regression models, adjusted for confounding factors, were used to determine median differences (MD) in utility scores by sex.
Results: Approximately 60% (6852/11 418) of stroke survivors had an EQ-5D-3L assessment (median 139 days; 44% female). Compared with men, women were older (median age 77.1 years vs. men 71.2 years) and fewer could walk on admission (37.9% vs. men 46.1%, P < 0.001). Women had lower utility values than men, and the difference was explained by age and stroke severity, but not clinical care [MDadjusted = -0.039, 95% confidence interval: -0.056, -0.021]. Poorer HRQoL was observed in younger men (aged <65 years), particularly those with more comorbidities, and in older women (aged ≥75 years).
Conclusions: Stroke severity and comorbidities contribute to the poorer HRQoL in young men and older women. Further studies are needed to understand age-sex interaction to better inform treatments for different subgroups and ensure evidence-based treatments to reduce the severity of stroke are prioritized.
Keywords: cerebrovascular diseases; cohort study; epidemiology; neurological disorders; quality of life; sex difference; stroke.
© 2020 European Academy of Neurology.
Comment in
-
Sex and gender differences in stroke-The need for individualised follow-up.Eur J Neurol. 2021 Feb;28(2):365-366. doi: 10.1111/ene.14619. Epub 2020 Nov 26. Eur J Neurol. 2021. PMID: 33131136 No abstract available.
References
-
- Phan HT, Blizzard CL, Reeves MJ, et al. Sex differences in long-term quality of life among survivors after stroke in the INSTRUCT. Stroke 2019; 50: 2299-2306.
-
- Gall SL, Tran PL, Martin K, Blizzard L, Srikanth V. Sex differences in long-term outcomes after stroke: functional outcomes, handicap, and quality of life. Stroke 2012; 43: 1982-1987.
-
- Gall S, Phan H, Madsen TE, et al. Focused update of sex differences in patient reported outcome measures after stroke. Stroke 2018; 49: 531-535.
-
- Reeves MJ, Bushnell CD, Howard G, et al. Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 915-926.
-
- Appelros P, Stegmayr B, Terent A. A review on sex differences in stroke treatment and outcome. Acta Neurol Scand 2010; 121: 359-369.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
