Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;34(11):14150-14159.
doi: 10.1096/fj.202001466R. Epub 2020 Sep 13.

Conspicuity of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: A cross-disciplinary translational hypothesis

Affiliations

Conspicuity of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: A cross-disciplinary translational hypothesis

Joseph M Norris et al. FASEB J. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has transformed the risk stratification and diagnostic approach for suspected prostate cancer. The majority of clinically significant prostate cancers are visible on pre-biopsy mpMRI, however, there are a subset of significant tumors that are not detected by mpMRI. The radiobiological mechanisms underpinning mpMRI-visibility and invisibility of these cancers remain uncertain. Emerging evidence suggests that mpMRI-visible tumors are enriched with molecular features associated with increased disease aggressivity and poor clinical prognosis, which is supported by short-term endpoints, such as biochemical recurrence following surgery. Furthermore, at the histopathological level, mpMRI-visible tumors appear to exhibit increased architectural and vascular density compared to mpMRI-invisible disease. It seems probable that the genomic, pathological, radiological, and clinical features of mpMRI-visible and mpMRI-invisible prostate cancers are interrelated. Here, we propose a novel cross-disciplinary theory that links genomic and molecular evidence with cellular and histopathological appearances, elucidating both the mpMRI visibility and clinical status of significant prostate cancer.

Keywords: conspicuity theory; multiparametric MRI; prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Norris receives funding from the MRC. Simpson receives funding from the Rosetrees Trust. Whitaker receives funding from Prostate Cancer UK, the Urology Foundation and the Rosetrees Trust. Emberton, Freeman, and Kirkham have stock interest in Nuada Medical Ltd. Emberton receives funding from NIHR‐i4i, MRC, Sonacare Inc, Trod Medical, Cancer Vaccine Institute and Sophiris Biocorp for trials in prostate cancer. Emberton is a medical consultant to Sonacare Inc, Sophiris Biocorp, Steba Biotech, GSK, Exact Imaging and Profound Medical. Travel allowance was previously provided from Sanofi Aventis, Astellas, GSK, and Sonacare. Emberton is a proctor for HIFU with Sonacare Inc and is paid for training other surgeons in this procedure.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Integrated clinical, histopathological, and genetic aspects of mpMRI‐visible and mpMRI‐invisible prostate cancer. A, mpMRI‐visible disease appears to be associated with reduced time to biochemical recurrence (tBCR) following radical prostatectomy compared to increased tBCR in mpMRI‐invisible disease. B, Histopathological features of mpMRI‐visible disease include higher pathological grade, increased cell density (top red arrow), and increased microvessel density (top blue arrow) compared to lower cell density (bottom red arrow), microvessel density (bottom blue arrow), visible lesions have increased intraductal and cribriform architecture (dotted red line), and regions of hypoxia (dashed blue line) while mpMRI‐invisible tumors have increased areas of stroma (white dashed line). C, Genetic features of mpMRI‐visible disease include increased DNA damage and repair defects, increased hypoxic and angiogenic signaling, and increased proliferative signaling. mpMRI‐invisible disease is characterized by lower genomic prostate scores (GPS), cell‐cycle progression scores (CCP), and genomic classifier (GC) scores, indicative of lower risk malignancy
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Potential scenarios for threshold alignment, between development of clinical significance (green line; from organ‐confinement through to metastases) and tumor visibility on mpMRI (blue line; from a small number of invisible cells to large visible tumors). Top: Tumor visibility may occur before onset of clinical significance, which risks overtreatment. Middle: Tumor visibility may occur at the point of development of clinical significance, which would represent an optimal treatment window. Bottom: Tumor visibility may occur after onset of clinical significance, which risks missing the window of curability

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmed HU, El‐Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi‐parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389:815‐822. - PubMed
    1. Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, et al. MRI‐targeted or standard biopsy for prostate‐cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1767‐1777. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wise J. NICE recommends MRI for suspected prostate cancer to reduce biopsies. BMJ. 2018;363:k5290. - PubMed
    1. Dasgupta P, Davis J, Hughes S. NICE guidelines on prostate cancer 2019. BJU Int. 2019;124:1. 10.1111/bju.14815 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Radtke JP, Kuru TH, Boxler S, et al. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging‐ultrasound fusion guidance. J Urol. 2015;193:87‐94. - PubMed

Publication types