Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 18:13:809-821.
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S264671. eCollection 2020.

Factors Affecting Quality of Laboratory Result During Ordering, Handling, and Testing of the Patient's Specimen at Hawassa University College of Medicine and Health Science Comprehensive Specialized Hospital

Affiliations

Factors Affecting Quality of Laboratory Result During Ordering, Handling, and Testing of the Patient's Specimen at Hawassa University College of Medicine and Health Science Comprehensive Specialized Hospital

Demissie Assegu Fenta et al. J Multidiscip Healthc. .

Abstract

Background: The increase of medical laboratory test errors represents the increase of all defects within the process. An error can be any defect during the entire process, from ordering to reporting. It may have negative effects on patient care, by contributing to inappropriate treatment, an increase in lengths of hospital stay, and dissatisfaction with healthcare services. Therefore, this study aimed to determine factors affecting the quality of laboratory results through the entire process.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Hawassa University hospital from October 2018 to May 2019. Data were collected by using structured questionnaires and checklist and entered and analyzed using SPSS version 21. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 455 individuals participated in this study. During the actual observational assessment, 72.5% of laboratory professionals identify their patients correctly and 62.5% of them label the sample before collection. In multivariate logistic regression, labeling of sample before collection (AOR=1.357, 95% CI=1.09, 1.58, P- 0.017), use of unmixed (AOR=4.364, 95% CI=1.950, 20.036, P- 0.049) and hemolyzed blood for testing (AOR=1.403, 95% CI=1.096, 1.692 P- 0.021) were associated with laboratory test errors. The clinical service providers who requested the test believed, lack of efficient laboratory service (P=0.005), unable to use manuals (P=0.025), and incorrect interpretation of reference booklets were associated with laboratory errors. Patient residence and frequency of first and second visits of the hospital were statistically associated with laboratory errors.

Conclusion: The occurrence of laboratory errors in our study was demonstrated by the distribution pattern, the preanalytical, analytical, and post-analytical steps. But changes have occurred in the types and frequencies of errors in these phases of testing by laboratory professionals, clinicians, and patients in the current study. Therefore, the hospital administrations, laboratory professionals and clinicians should work harder and closer to solve the identified problems.

Keywords: Ethiopia; clinical services providers; laboratory result; patients Hawassa; quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have read and approved the manuscript and ensure no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Observational assessment of laboratory requests using checklist (n=184).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roberto Verna Adriana BV, Laposata M. Reducing diagnostic errors worldwide through diagnostic management teams. AnnLabMed. 2019;39:121–124. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WASPaLM. World Association Of Societies Of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 63rd Session of the WHO Regional Committee for Europe, Turkey, 16–19 September 2013. Report.
    1. Lippi G, Banfi G, Church S, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement. In pursuit of harmony, on behalf of the European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) working group for preanalytical phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(3):357–370. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-1051 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lippi G, Becan-McBride K, Behúlová D, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: in the quality we trust. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(1):229–241. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0597 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lippi G, Bassi A, Brocco G, Montagnana M, Salvagno GL, Guidi GC. Preanalytic error tracking in a laboratory medicine department: results of a 1-year experience. Clin Chem. 2006;52:1442–1443. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2006.069534 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources