Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 22;9(1):1771925.
doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1771925.

A liposomal RNA vaccine inducing neoantigen-specific CD4+ T cells augments the antitumor activity of local radiotherapy in mice

Affiliations

A liposomal RNA vaccine inducing neoantigen-specific CD4+ T cells augments the antitumor activity of local radiotherapy in mice

Nadja Salomon et al. Oncoimmunology. .

Abstract

Antigen-encoding, lipoplex-formulated RNA (RNA-LPX) enables systemic delivery to lymphoid compartments and selective expression in resident antigen-presenting cells. We report here that the rejection of CT26 tumors, mediated by local radiotherapy (LRT), is further augmented in a CD8+ T cell-dependent manner by an RNA-LPX vaccine that encodes CD4+ T cell-recognized neoantigens (CD4 neoantigen vaccine). Whereas CD8+ T cells induced by LRT alone were primarily directed against the immunodominant gp70 antigen, mice treated with LRT plus the CD4 neoantigen vaccine rejected gp70-negative tumors and were protected from rechallenge with these tumors, indicating a potent poly-antigenic CD8+ T cell response and T cell memory. In the spleens of CD4 neoantigen-vaccinated mice, we found a high number of activated, poly-functional, Th1-like CD4+ T cells against ME1, the immunodominant CD4 neoantigen within the poly-neoantigen vaccine. LRT itself strongly increased CD8+ T cell numbers and clonal expansion. However, tumor infiltrates of mice treated with CD4 neoantigen vaccine/LRT, as compared to LRT alone, displayed a higher fraction of activated gp70-specific CD8+ T cells, lower PD-1/LAG-3 expression and contained ME1-specific IFNγ+ CD4+ T cells capable of providing cognate help. CD4 neoantigen vaccine/LRT treatment followed by anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy further enhanced the efficacy with complete remission of gp70-negative CT26 tumors and survival of all mice. Our data highlight the power of combining synergistic modes of action and warrants further exploration of the presented treatment schema.

Keywords: CD4+ T cells; RNA-LPX; Radiotherapy; cancer vaccines; neoantigens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A CD4 neoantigen vaccine improves LRT-mediated survival of mice with CT26 tumors in a CD8+ T cell-dependent manner. (a–c) CT26 tumor growth (a) and survival (b) of BALB/c mice (n = 7–8/group) locally irradiated with 12 Gy or 3 × 6 Gy at a mean volume of 60 mm3. (c) gp70-AH1 tetramer+ CD8+ T cells in blood of treated mice (n = 4–5/group). (d-f) CT26 tumor growth (d) and survival (e) of mice (n = 7–12/group) locally irradiated with 12 Gy at a mean tumor volume of ~70 mm3 and immunized three times with CT26 PME1 or control RNA-LPX. (f) Gp70-AH1 tetramer+ CD8+ T cells in blood of treated mice (n = all mice/group). (g-i) CT26 tumor growth (g) and survival (h) of mice (n = 8–9/group) immunized with CT26 PME1 or control RNA and locally irradiated at a mean tumor volume of 90 mm3. CD8+ T cells were depleted 6 days after LRT, administering the anti-CD8 antibody every 3–4 days over 3 weeks. (i) Gp70-AH1 tetramer+ CD8+ T cells in blood of treated mice (n = 8–9/group). Significance was determined using (b, e, h) Mantel-cox log-rank test and (c, f, i) one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (a, d, g) Tumor growth is displayed on a log2-scale. Ratios depict frequency of mice with complete tumor responses (CR). Mean±SEM. nd = not determined.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Activated poly-functional Th1-like CD4+ T cells against the immunodominant vaccine-encoded CD4 neoantigen are induced in the spleen of CD4 neoantigen vaccine/LRT treated mice. (a–c) CT26 tumor growth (a) and survival (b) of BALB/c mice (n = 7–10/group) treated with 12 Gy at a mean tumor volume of 45 mm3 and immunized with different RNA-LPX vaccines. RNA-LPX vaccines included CT26 PME1; CT26 ME1, the most immunogenic CT26 PME1 neoantigen; Pctrl. encoding mutations not expressed in CT26 and control RNA-LPX, encoding no antigens at all. (c) Gp70-AH1 tetramer+ CD8+ T cells in treated mice (n = 7–10/group). (d, e) Phenotypic analysis of enriched splenic CD4+ T cells from mice immunized with CT26 PME1 or control RNA-LPX (n = 5/group). (d) Differential expression of ICOS, CD69, PD-1, CD62L, T-bet, CD25 on ME1-specific (ME1tet+) and -nonspecific (ME1tet) CD4+ T cells as determined by flow cytometry. Representative pseudocolor plots of ME1 tetramer staining are shown. (e) Supernatant cytokine secretion after 48 h co-culture of CD4+ T cells with ME1-peptide-loaded BALB/c BMDC. (f) IFNγ intracellular cytokine staining after ex vivo re-stimulation of enriched splenic CD4+ T cells from CT26-tumor-bearing mice, locally 12 Gy irradiated at a mean tumor volume of 60 mm3 and immunized with CT26 PME1 or control RNA-LPX, with ME1 peptide-loaded BMDC (n = 6/group). Significance was determined using (b) Mantel-Cox log-rank test, (c, d, f) one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test and (e) unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-test. (a) Tumor growth is displayed on a log2-scale. Ratios depict frequency of mice with complete tumor responses (CR). Mean±SEM.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Adding the CD4 neoantigen vaccine to LRT results in a potent polyantigenic CD8+ T cell response and T cell memory. (a) IFNγ ELISpot using splenocytes isolated from CT26 tumor-bearing BALB/c mice, vaccinated with CT26 PME1 or control RNA-LPX and locally irradiated at a mean tumor volume of 45 mm3 (n = 6 mice/group, 2 mice pooled each), against CT26 cells, gp70-AH1 peptide-pulsed BALB/c BMDC, CT26-gp70KO, and 20 Gy irradiated CT26-gp70KO cells. In vitro irradiation was performed to enhance tumor cell MHC class I presentation (Supplementary Figure 3(a)). (b-d) CT26-gp70KO tumor growth (b) and survival (c) of mice immunized with CT26 PME1 or control RNA-LPX and irradiated at a mean volume of 45 mm3 (n = 7–10/group). (d) IFNγ ELISpot using splenocytes isolated from CT26 tumor-bearing mice (n = 4 mice/group, 2 mice pooled each) against CT26 cells, 20 Gy irradiated CT26-gp70KO cells and gp70-AH1 peptide-pulsed BALB/c BMDC. As in (a), in vitro irradiation was performed to enhance tumor cell MHC class I presentation (Supplementary Figure 3(a)). (e) Survival of 12 Gy and CT26 PME1/ME1 RNA-LPX treated CT26 tumor-free mice, challenged with a tumorigenic dose of CT26-gp70KO cells 40 days after initial tumor rejection (n = 10 each). Naïve BALB/c mice served as control group (n = 10). Significance was determined using (c, e) log-rank test and (a, d) one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (b) Tumor growth is displayed on a log2-scale. Ratios depict frequency of mice with complete tumor responses (CR). Mean±SEM.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Tumor immune infiltrates of CD4 neoantigen vaccine/LRT-treated mice consist of activated, tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and vaccine-induced CD4+ T cells capable of providing cognate help. (a, b) Analysis of TIL in CT26 tumor-bearing BALB/c mice (n = 5–6/group) treated with 12 Gy at a mean tumor volume of 45 mm3 and immunized with CT26 PME1 or control RNA-LPX. Tumors were resected 8 days after LRT. (a) Percentage of CD45+, tumor cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and (b) gp70-AH1 tetramer+ CD8+ T cells. Representative pseudocolor plots show gp70-AH1 tetramer staining. (c-e) Analysis of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells (c, d) and CD4+ T cells (e) from CT26 tumor-bearing mice locally irradiated with 12 Gy at a mean tumor volume of 60 mm3 and immunized three times with CT26 PME1 or control RNA-LPX (n = 6/group). CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were enriched via CD45+ TIL MACS for (c) phenotypic analysis or (d, e) intracellular cytokine staining after restimulation with gp70-AH1 or ME1 peptide-loaded BALB/c BMDC. Representative pseudocolor plots show CD8+ (d, right) and CD4+ (e, right) T cells after peptide restimulation. (f, g) TCRβ CDR3 sequencing of tumor CD8+ T cells from mice (n = 3–4/group), irradiated with 12 Gy at a mean tumor volume of ~100 mm3 and immunized three times with CT26 PME1 RNA-LPX or control RNA-LPX, analyzed 9 days after irradiation. (g) Number of unique TCRβ sequences in tumors or treated mice (left) and mean TCRβ clonotype frequency (clonality) of CD8+ T cells (right). (f) Frequency of blood-tumor shared TCRβ clones prior and 9 days after LRT compared to all unique tumor clones found 9 days after LRT. Significance was determined using (a–g) one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Mean±SEM.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
CD4 neoantigen vaccine/LRT treatment followed by anti-CTLA4 antibody therapy further enhances the efficacy with complete remission of gp70-negative CT26 tumors and survival of all mice. (a–c) CT26-gp70KO tumor growth (a) and survival (b) of BALB/c mice (n = 13–14/group) locally irradiated with 12 Gy at a mean tumor volume of 60 mm3, immunized three times with CT26 ME1 or control RNA-LPX and treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 antibodies 3, 8, and 13 days after LRT. (c) IFNγ ELISpot using peripheral blood lymphocytes against wild-type or irradiated CT26-gp70KO cells (n = 13–14/group, blood of 3–4 mice pooled/data point). Significance was determined using (b) Mantel-Cox log-rank test and (c) one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (a) Tumor growth is displayed on a log2-scale. Ratios depict frequency of mice with complete tumor responses (CR). Mean±SEM.

References

    1. Orth M, Lauber K, Niyazi M, et al. Current concepts in clinical radiation oncology. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2014;53(1):1–29. doi:10.1007/s00411-013-0497-2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gupta A, Probst HC, Vuong V, Landshammer A, Muth S, Yagita H, Schwendener R, Pruschy M, Knuth A, van den Broek M, et al. Radiotherapy promotes tumor-specific effector cd8+t cells via dendritic cell activation. The Journal of Immunology. 2012;189(2):558–13. (Baltimore, Md.: 1950). doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1200563. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galluzzi L, Buqué A, Kepp O, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G.. Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2017;17(2):97–111. doi:10.1038/nri.2016.107. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deng L, Liang H, Xu M, Yang X, Burnette B, Arina A, Li X-D, Mauceri H, Beckett M, Darga T, et al. STING-dependent cytosolic DNA sensing promotes radiation-induced type i interferon-dependent antitumor immunity in immunogenic tumors. Immunity. 2014;41(5):843–852. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Formenti SC, Demaria S. Radiation therapy to convert the tumor into an in situ vaccine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84(4):879–880. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.06.020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types