Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep:26:100533.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100533. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in six care homes in London, April 2020

Affiliations

Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in six care homes in London, April 2020

Shamez N Ladhani et al. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Care homes are experiencing large outbreaks of COVID-19 associated with high case-fatality rates. We conducted detailed investigations in six London care homes reporting suspected COVID-19 outbreaks during April 2020.

Methods: Residents and staff had nasal swabs for SARS CoV-2 testing using RT-PCR and were followed-up for 14 days. They were categorized as symptomatic, post-symptomatic or pre-symptomatic if they had symptoms at the time of testing, in the two weeks before or two weeks after testing, respectively, or asymptomatic throughout. Virus isolation and whole genome sequencing (WGS) was also performed.

Findings: Across the six care homes, 105/264 (39.8%) residents were SARS CoV-2 positive, including 28 (26.7%) symptomatic, 10 (9.5%) post-symptomatic, 21 (20.0%) pre-symptomatic and 46 (43.8%) who remained asymptomatic. Case-fatality at 14-day follow-up was highest among symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive residents (10/28, 35.7%) compared to asymptomatic (2/46, 4.3%), post-symptomatic (2/10, 20.0%) or pre-symptomatic (3/21,14.3%) residents. Among staff, 53/254 (20.9%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive and 26/53 (49.1%) remained asymptomatic. RT-PCR cycle-thresholds and live-virus recovery were similar between symptomatic/asymptomatic residents/staff. Higher RT-PCR cycle threshold values (lower virus load) samples were associated with exponentially decreasing ability to recover infectious virus (P<0.001). WGS identified multiple (up to 9) separate introductions of different SARS-CoV-2 strains into individual care homes.

Interpretation: A high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 positivity was found in care homes residents and staff, half of whom were asymptomatic and potential reservoirs for on-going transmission. A third of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 residents died within 14 days. Symptom-based screening alone is not sufficient for outbreak control.

Funding: None.

Keywords: Care homes; Case-fatality rate; Covid-19; Symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
SARS-CoV-2 positivity, symptoms, live virus isolation and deaths in residents and staff across six London care homes experiencing a COVID-19 outbreak during April 2020. In SARS-CoV-2 positive residents, live virus was isolated from 5/17 (29.4%) of symptomatic and 14/33 (42.4%) of asymptomatic residents at the time of testing (P = 0.37) and 14/40 (35.0%) survivors compared with 5/10 (50.0%) of fatal cases (P = 0.38).
Fig 2
Fig. 2
a. Boxplot showing median Cycle Threshold (Ct) values with interquartile ranges (Boxes) along with minimum (Q1–1.5*IQR) and maximum (Q3+1.5*IQR) values (whiskers) and outlier values (blue circles) for asymptomatic, post-symptomatic, pre-symptomatic and symptomatic residents and staff. 2b. Live virus isolation by RT-PCR Cycle threshold (t) range in residents and staff of care homes. The data points include live virus isolation by number of strains tested.
Fig 3
Fig. 3
Maximum Likelihood phylogeny of 99 SARS-CoV-2 genomes from individuals within six care homes. Coloured branches are used to indicate the care home, staff are annotated on the tree with (S), genomes from patients who died after testing positive for covid-19 are shown with (X). Unannotated tips in the phylogeny represent genomes from care home residents.

References

    1. Onder G., Rezza G., Brusaferro S. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy. JAMA. 2020 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2763667 Available at: Accessed: 24 July 2020. - PubMed
    1. Logar S. Care home facilities as new COVID-19 hotspots: lombardy Region (Italy) case study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;89 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nursing Homes are ground zero for COVID-19 pandemic: March 4, 2020. JAMA Network 2020. 2020. Available athttps://jamanetwork.com/channels/health-forum/fullarticle/2763666. Accessed: 24 July 2020.
    1. Wang H., Li T., Barbarino P. Dementia care during COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395:1190–1191. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lauretani F., Ravazzoni G., Roberti M.F. Assessment and treatment of older individuals with COVID 19 multi-system disease: clinical and ethical implications. Acta Biomed. 2020;91:150–168. - PMC - PubMed