Financial Toxicity in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the United States: Current State and Future Directions
- PMID: 32924728
- PMCID: PMC7792407
- DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017793
Financial Toxicity in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the United States: Current State and Future Directions
Abstract
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) has posed an increasing burden on Americans and the United States healthcare system for decades. In addition, ASCVD has had a substantial economic impact, with national expenditures for ASCVD projected to increase by over 2.5-fold from 2015 to 2035. This rapid increase in costs associated with health care for ASCVD has consequences for payers, healthcare providers, and patients. The issues to patients are particularly relevant in recent years, with a growing trend of shifting costs of treatment expenses to patients in various forms, such as high deductibles, copays, and coinsurance. Therefore, the issue of "financial toxicity" of health care is gaining significant attention. The term encapsulates the deleterious impact of healthcare expenditures for patients. This includes the economic burden posed by healthcare costs, but also the unintended consequences it creates in form of barriers to necessary medical care, quality of life as well tradeoffs related to non-health-related necessities. While the societal impact of rising costs related to ASCVD management have been actively studied and debated in policy circles, there is lack of a comprehensive assessment of the current literature on the financial impact of cost sharing for ASCVD patients and their families. In this review we systematically describe the scope and domains of financial toxicity, the instruments that measure various facets of healthcare-related financial toxicity, and accentuating factors and consequences on patient health and well-being. We further identify avenues and potential solutions for clinicians to apply in medical practice to mitigate the burden and consequences of out-of-pocket costs for ASCVD patients and their families.
Keywords: catastrophic expense; cost-of-care; financial distress; financial toxicity; medical bankruptcy; medical bills; out-of-pocket costs.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr Nasir is supported by the Jerold B. Katz Academy of Translational Research, and serves on the Advisory board for Amgen, Novartis and Esperion. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report.
Figures




References
-
- Khavjou OA, Phelps D, Leib A. Projections of cardiovascular disease prevalence and costs: 2015–2035. Available at: http://www.heart.org/idc/groups/heart-public/@wcm/@adv/documents/dow.... Accessed August 2, 2018.
-
- Abdus S, Selden TM, Keenan P. The financial burdens of high‐deductible plans. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35:2297–2301. - PubMed
-
- Mazurenko O, Buntin MJB, Menachemi N. High‐deductible health plans and prevention. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019;40:411–421. - PubMed
-
- Press VG, Gerald JK. High‐deductible health plans make the chronically ill pay more for less. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020;17:30–31. - PubMed
-
- Miller GE, Vistnes JP, Rohde F, Keenan PS. High‐deductible health plan enrollment increased from 2006 to 2016, employer‐funded accounts grew in largest firms. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37:1231–1237. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical