Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 9;10(2):200-202.
doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000322.

Chemotherapy for Retinoblastoma: Impact of Intravitreal Chemotherapy

Affiliations
Free article

Chemotherapy for Retinoblastoma: Impact of Intravitreal Chemotherapy

Vishal Raval et al. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). .
Free article

Abstract

Chemotherapy is now the primary treatment of retinoblastoma in eyes with visual potential or those that are considered not advanced for retinoblastoma. In addition to intravenous chemotherapy (IVC), drugs delivered via alternative routes such as intra-arterial and intravitreal administration have emerged as promising options for management of retinoblastoma. Various studies have shown excellent results in salvaging nearly 100% of groups A-C eyes; however, intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) seems to offer superior local control rates as compared with IVC for advanced intraocular retinoblastoma (groups D and E eyes). Intravitreal chemotherapy (IVitC), that delivers the highest concentration of drug in the vitreous cavity while minimizing systemic drug concentration, has emerged in recent years (2012) as an effective treatment for refractory or persistent vitreous seeding. The role of concomitant and subsequent therapies is an important consideration, particularly the use of IVitC in combination with IAC. As IVitC became acceptable during the era of IAC, most of the patients treated previously with IVC did not receive IVitC. Therefore, it is possible that some of the IVC failures could have been avoided with the use of IVitC. We provide our perspective of published data that seems to be skewed by evolving practice patterns that project enhanced efficacy of IAC when compared with historic control rates achieved with IVC. In absence of better-quality data or randomized controlled trials, it is hard to establish superiority of one treatment over the other.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Broaddus E, Topham A, Singh AD. Incidence of retinoblastoma in the USA: 1975-2004. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93:21–23.
    1. Kivela T. The epidemiological challenge of the most frequent eye cancer: retinoblastoma, an issue of birth and death. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93:1129–1131.
    1. Abramson DH, Beaverson K, Sangani P, et al. Screening for retinoblastoma: presenting signs as prognosticators of patient and ocular survival. Pediatrics 2003; 112 (6 pt 1):1248–1255.
    1. Jabbour P, Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, et al. Pearls and pitfalls of intraarterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012; 10:175–181.
    1. MacCarthy A, Birch JM, Draper GJ, et al. Retinoblastoma: treatment and survival in Great Britain 1963 to 2002. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93:38–39.