Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Oct;41(9):1214-1221.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002741.

Cochlear Implant Therapy Improves the Quality of Life in Older Patients-A Prospective Evaluation Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Cochlear Implant Therapy Improves the Quality of Life in Older Patients-A Prospective Evaluation Study

Christian Issing et al. Otol Neurotol. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effects of cochlear implant (CI) hearing rehabilitation on quality of life in older patients (≥65 yr).

Study design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Medical University Frankfurt/Main.

Patients: Patients aged between 65 and 86 years who received unilateral CI therapy for the first time.

Intervention: Unilateral cochlear implantation.

Main outcome measures: In addition to audiological parameters, the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale - old (WHOQL-OLD) was used to assess quality of life prior to surgery, at the time of first fitting of the audio processor (approx. 1 mo after surgery) and 6 months afterward. Dementia and depression were excluded using dementia detection test (DemTect) and geriatric depression scale.

Results: Speech recognition improved significantly during the study period. Furthermore, the total WHOQL-OLD score showed a significant improvement of quality of life comparing the preoperative and the 6 months data (60.0 ± 15.7 to 66.8 ± 12.2 points) (p = 0.001). Only 6 months after surgery, comparable quality of life values were achieved compared to the corresponding population average of the same age group (67.96 ± 14.74 points). No statistically significant difference remained between the study group and the age-adjusted population average (p = 0.37).

Conclusion: To achieve auditory rehabilitation, CI treatment in older patients can be strongly recommended, not only hearing rehabilitation, but also to improve quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Schaarschmidt M. Cochlea-Implantate: Wenn Hörgeräte nicht mehr helfen… [in German]. Dtsch Arztebl. 2013;110: 36.
    1. Kempf HG, Büchner A, Stöver T. Cochlear implants in adults: Indications and realization. Special cases and technical parameters of the implantation systems [in German]. HNO 2003; 51:663676.
    1. Kempf HG, Büchner A, Stöver T. Cochlear implants in adults: Indications and realizations. Part I: Diagnosis, operation techniques and results. HNO 2003; 51:591603.
    1. Dorbritz J, Vogt G. Rasanter demografischer Wandel—Deutschland und Japan im Vergleich [in German]. Bevölkerungsforschung Aktuell 2015; 4:28.
    1. Ruh S, Battmer RD, Strauss-Schier A, Lenarz T. Cochlear implant in patients with residual hearing. Laryngorhinootologie 1997; 76:347350.

Publication types