Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2016747.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16747.

Association of Prediagnostic Frailty, Change in Frailty Status, and Mortality After Cancer Diagnosis in the Women's Health Initiative

Affiliations

Association of Prediagnostic Frailty, Change in Frailty Status, and Mortality After Cancer Diagnosis in the Women's Health Initiative

Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Understanding changes in frailty in relation to cancer diagnosis can inform optimal selection of cancer treatments and survivorship care.

Objective: To investigate associations of prediagnostic frailty and change in frailty status with mortality after a cancer diagnosis.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter, prospective cohort study included 7257 community-dwelling, postmenopausal women in the United States who had frailty assessed at the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) enrollment (1993-1998) and the 3-year visit who were subsequently diagnosed as having invasive cancer. The data were analyzed from January 7, 2019, to June, 8, 2020.

Exposure: Frailty scores were defined from validated questionnaire items conceptually aligned with the Fried frailty phenotype, including at least 3 of the following characteristics: self-reported unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, and muscle weakness or impaired walking. Physical function components of the frailty score were updated a median of 10 (range, 1-18) times.

Main outcomes and measures: Using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, this study examined associations of prediagnostic frailty (at the 3-year visit, before cancer diagnosis) and prediagnostic changes in frailty (from enrollment to the 3-year visit) with mortality. Women were followed up beginning from cancer diagnosis for mortality outcomes through March 2018. In linear mixed-effects models with frailty scores as a function of time since cancer diagnosis, this study evaluated whether the time slope, ie, the rate of change in frailty score, increased after cancer diagnosis.

Results: This study included 7257 women in the WHI cohort who completed frailty assessments at enrollment and the 3-year WHI visit before cancer diagnosis and subsequently developed cancer. Cancer cases included 2644 breast cancers (36%), 822 lung cancers (11%), 691 colorectal cancers (10%), 445 endometrial cancers (6%), and 286 ovarian cancers (4%). At the 3-year visit, prior to cancer diagnosis, the mean (SD) age was 63 (7) years, and 1161 of 7257 (16%) of participating women met criteria for frailty; 2129 of 7257 (29%) were prefrail, and 3967 of 7257 (55%) were nonfrail. Over a median follow-up of 5.8 years after cancer diagnosis (range, 1 day to 19.9 years), 3056 women died. After multivariable adjustment, women who were frail (vs nonfrail) before cancer diagnosis had an increased risk of mortality after cancer diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 1.26-1.55; P for trend <.001). Sustained frailty (21% [1537 of 7257] of women) or worsening frailty (22% [1578 of 7257]) vs being consistently nonfrail (45% [3266 of 7257]) before cancer diagnosis increased the risk of mortality after cancer diagnosis (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.14-1.38 and 1.22; 95% CI, 1.11-1.34, respectively; P for trend <.001). In linear mixed-effects models, the rate of increase in physical frailty over time was statistically significantly higher after cancer diagnosis.

Conclusions and relevance: Sustained and worsening frailty before cancer diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of mortality after cancer diagnosis in postmenopausal women. Furthermore, the rate of decline in physical function accelerated after cancer diagnosis. Frailty assessment could provide valuable information and perhaps prompt interventions to reduce and preempt worsening of physical frailty after cancer diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Cespedes Feliciano reported receiving grants from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Dr Rosko reported receiving grants and mentorship from the NCI; receiving travel support from VYXEOS; receiving personal fees from the Association of Community Cancer Centers, Medscape, and OncLive; and receiving other from Janssen, Millennium, Regeneron, and Acetylon. Dr Anderson reported receiving grants from the NCI and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Dr Paskett reported receiving grants from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, the Merck Foundation, and Pfizer. Dr Caan reported receiving grants from the NCI. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Overall Survival Probability After Cancer Diagnosis Among 7257 Women in the WHI Study by Prediagnostic Frailty Status
WHI indicates Women’s Health Initiative.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Rate of Increase in Physical Frailty From Before to After Cancer Diagnosis Among 7257 Women in the WHI Study
Physical frailty assessments are based on the frailty score at the 3-year Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study visit and subsequent updates to the physical function component of the frailty score. Analyses are restricted to women diagnosed as having cancer. Shown is the change in frailty score in relation to cancer diagnosis from a linear mixed-effects model with a piecewise linear spline (knot at date of cancer diagnosis) and a random intercept and slope for each individual.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Time-Varying Frailty Status and Mortality After Cancer Diagnosis Among 7257 Women in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Study
Frailty scores are a time-varying exposure, with nonfrail as the reference. All Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for the following covariates at the 3-year WHI visit: race/ethnicity, body mass index, pack-years of smoking, educational attainment, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and any family history of cancer. P for trend was calculated for frailty categories as an ordinal variable. All analyses were restricted to women without a prior cancer diagnosis at the 3-year WHI visit who were followed up for mortality beginning from the date of their first cancer diagnosis through March 2018. HR indicates hazard ratio.

References

    1. Bluethmann SM, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH. Anticipating the “silver tsunami”: prevalence trajectories and comorbidity burden among older cancer survivors in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(7):1029-1036. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0133 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381(9868):752-762. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ethun CG, Bilen MA, Jani AB, Maithel SK, Ogan K, Master VA. Frailty and cancer: implications for oncology surgery, medical oncology, and radiation oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(5):362-377. doi:10.3322/caac.21406 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M, et al. . International Society of Geriatric Oncology consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(24):2595-2603. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8347 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woods NF, LaCroix AZ, Gray SL, et al. ; Women’s Health Initiative . Frailty: emergence and consequences in women aged 65 and older in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(8):1321-1330. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53405.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms