Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;46(3):1210-1215.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02722-0. Epub 2020 Sep 14.

Emergency department length of stay following discontinuation of routine oral contrast material

Kevin Y Kim #  1 , Nelly Tan #  2   3 , Jeremy Moretz  1 , Matthew S Davenport  4
Affiliations

Emergency department length of stay following discontinuation of routine oral contrast material

Kevin Y Kim et al. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effect of discontinuing routine oral contrast material on emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS), time from order to CT completion, and preliminary report turnaround time (TAT).

Methods: A HIPAA-compliant, IRB-waived, single-institution, retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients presenting with abdominal pain to the ED from October 2015 to April 2019. Routine oral contrast material was administered prior to July 2018 and discontinued thereafter. CT workflow (ED LOS, exam completion time, report TAT) data were analyzed in a univariate analysis before and after discontinuation of oral contrast. Pre- versus post-policy data were compared with 2-sided t tests. The primary outcome was ED LOS. Data were analyzed on a process control chart and confidence limits were adjusted using established criteria.

Results: There were 5020 included abdominopelvic CTs. After routine oral contrast material was discontinued, ED LOS (13.4 h vs 10.7 h, p < 0.001) and time from CT order to CT completion (2.7 h vs 2.1 h, p < 0.001) declined. However, control chart analysis revealed improvement in overall LOS preceded the policy change by 9 months, while improvement in time to CT completion coincided with the policy change. Preliminary report TAT increased by 4 min after the policy change (29 min vs. 33 min, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Discontinuation of routine oral contrast material in the ED accelerated time to CT completion but had a minor non-significant effect on overall ED LOS. Much of the reduction in overall LOS likely was due to unrelated process improvements.

Keywords: Abdominal pain; CT abdomen and pelvis; Oral contrast; Quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Fishman EK. Spiral CT: applications in the emergency patient. Radiographics. 1996;16(4):943-948. - DOI
    1. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. Helical CT with only colonic contrast material for diagnosing diverticulitis: prospective evaluation of 150 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(6):1445-1449. - DOI
    1. Uyeda JW, Yu H, Ramalingam V, Devalapalli AP, Soto JA, Anderson SW. Evaluation of Acute Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Setting Using Computed Tomography Without Oral Contrast in Patients With Body Mass Index Greater Than 25. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015;39(5):681-686. - DOI
    1. Alabousi A, Patlas MN, Sne N, Katz DS. Is Oral Contrast Necessary for Multidetector Computed Tomography Imaging of Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain? Can Assoc Radiol J. 2015;66(4):318-322. - DOI
    1. Kessner R, Barnes S, Halpern P, Makrin V, Blachar A. CT for Acute Nontraumatic Abdominal Pain-Is Oral Contrast Really Required? Acad Radiol. 2017;24(7):840-845. - DOI