Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Jan;41(1):123-135.
doi: 10.1002/pd.5829. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with central nervous system anomalies: An 8-year long observational study from a tertiary care university hospital

Maddalena Santirocco  1   2 , Alberto Plaja  2   3 , Carlota Rodó  1   2 , Irene Valenzuela  3 , Silvia Arévalo  1   2 , Neus Castells  2   3 , Anna Abuli  2   3 , Eduardo Tizzano  2   3 , Nerea Maiz  1   2 , Elena Carreras  1   2
Affiliations
Observational Study

Chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with central nervous system anomalies: An 8-year long observational study from a tertiary care university hospital

Maddalena Santirocco et al. Prenat Diagn. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of DNA copy number variants (CNVs) detected with array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in fetuses with central nervous system (CNS) anomalies. Secondary objectives were to describe the prevalence of CNV in specific CNS abnormalities, in isolated defects or associated with other malformations or fetal growth restriction (FGR).

Methods: Observational cohort study in 238 fetuses with CNS anomalies in which an array-CGH had been performed between January 2009 and December 2017. Pathogenic CNV and variants of unknown significance (VUS) were reported.

Results: Pathogenic CNVs were found in 16/238 cases (6.7%), VUS in 18/238 (7.6%), and normal result in 204/238 (85.7%) cases. Pathogenic CNVs were more frequent in posterior fossa anomalies (cerebellar hypoplasia 33%, megacisterna magna 20%), moderate ventriculomegaly (11%) and spina bifida (3.7%). Pathogenic CNVs and VUS were found in 7/182 (3.8%) and 14/182 (7.7%) cases of isolated anomalies, in 9/49 (18.4%) and 4/49 (8.2%) presenting another malformation, and in 0/7 and 0/7 cases with associated FGR (P = .001, P = .741, respectively).

Conclusion: These results provide strong evidence toward performing array in fetuses with CNS anomalies, particular in cases of posterior fossa anomalies. The prevalence of pathogenic CNVs is higher in association with other malformations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Chitty LS, Pilu G. The challenge of imaging the fetal central nervous system: an aid to prenatal diagnosis, management and prognosis. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29(4):301-302.
    1. Onkar D. Evaluation of fetal central nervous system anomalies by ultrasound and its anatomical co-relation. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(6):AC05-AC07.
    1. Jeng LB, Tarvin R, Robin NH. Genetic advances in central nervous system malformations in the fetus and neonate. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2001;8(2):89-99.
    1. Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(23):2175-2184.
    1. Bui T-H, Vetro A, Zuffardi O, Shaffer LG. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: is conventional chromosome analysis necessary in the post-array CGH era? Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(3):235-243.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources