Integrative Review of Reproductive Decision Making of Women Who Are BRCA Positive
- PMID: 32926832
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.07.006
Integrative Review of Reproductive Decision Making of Women Who Are BRCA Positive
Abstract
Objective: To synthesize research findings about reproductive decision making among women who are BRCA positive.
Data sources: PubMed and CINAHL.
Study selection: Articles published in English between 2000 and June 28, 2020, about the reproductive decision making of women with a confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
Data extraction: We extracted data about participants, study design, analysis, follow-up, and results. We used the modified Downs and Black checklist and Kennelly's qualitative data analysis to rate studies for quality and applicability by using.
Data synthesis: We included five of 257 screened articles in our synthesis. The total sample size of the five studies was 1,468 women. The most prevalent factors related to reproductive decision making were the impending decisions regarding childbearing and family choices, including decisions about biological children, preventive surgery, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, and prenatal diagnosis to prevent further transmission of a BRCA mutation, and family planning.
Conclusion: A lack of knowledge exists about the reproductive decision-making processes of women who are BRCA positive. A better understanding of this process would provide nurses and other clinicians with the knowledge needed to support these women through their reproductive life choices.
Keywords: BRCA; breast and ovarian cancer; decision making; family planning.
Copyright © 2020 AWHONN, the Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Reproductive decision-making in young female carriers of a BRCA mutation.Hum Reprod. 2013 Apr;28(4):1006-12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des441. Epub 2013 Jan 4. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23293217
-
Decision-making on preimplantation genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for couples with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.Hum Reprod. 2014 May;29(5):1103-12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu034. Epub 2014 Mar 6. Hum Reprod. 2014. PMID: 24603131
-
"It was an Emotional Baby": Previvors' Family Planning Decision-Making Styles about Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk.J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1301-1313. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0069-8. Epub 2017 Jan 30. J Genet Couns. 2017. PMID: 28138923
-
Decisions and ethical issues among BRCA carriers and the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.Minerva Med. 2009 Oct;100(5):371-83. Minerva Med. 2009. PMID: 19910890 Review.
-
BRCA1/2 pathogenetic variant carriers and reproductive decisions: Gender differences and factors associated with the choice of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and prenatal diagnosis (PND).J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Jul;39(7):1433-1443. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02523-y. Epub 2022 Jun 4. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022. PMID: 35661074 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Psychosocial Factors Involved in Genetic Testing for Rare Diseases: A Scoping Review.Genes (Basel). 2025 May 22;16(6):614. doi: 10.3390/genes16060614. Genes (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40565506 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of BRCA Status on Reproductive Decision-Making and Self-Concept: A Mixed-Methods Study Informing the Development of Tailored Interventions.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 15;14(6):1494. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061494. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35326645 Free PMC article.
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders: clinical experience with BRCA1 and BRCA2 from 2010-2021.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Nov;40(11):2705-2713. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02925-6. Epub 2023 Sep 11. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023. PMID: 37691027 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Emotional Effects of Reproductive Decision-Making in Women With a BRCA Pathogenic Variant.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2025 Jun 12;52(4):302-312. doi: 10.1188/25.ONF.302-312. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2025. PMID: 40577581
-
BRCA1/2 testing for genetic susceptibility to cancer after 25 years: A scoping review and a primer on ethical implications.Breast. 2022 Feb;61:66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 11. Breast. 2022. PMID: 34920368 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous