Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct:82:133-137.
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 6.

Concurrent validity of the ZeroWire® footswitch system for the measurement of temporal gait parameters

Affiliations

Concurrent validity of the ZeroWire® footswitch system for the measurement of temporal gait parameters

C Pradeau et al. Gait Posture. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background: In contrast to wearable tools (like in-shoe) sensors, lab-based gait assessment (using pressure-sensitive mats or cameras) only acquire data over short distances in non-ecological environments.

Research question: To examine the concurrent validity of a wearable ZeroWire® footswitch system (Aurion Srl, Milan, Italy) vs. the GAITRite® walkway (CIR systems Inc., NJ, USA) for recording temporal gait parameters.

Methods: We included 40 healthy participants in a prospective, single-center study. Temporal gait parameters were recorded simultaneously with the ZeroWire® and GAITRite® systems while each participant walked at three different speeds (slow (60steps/min), comfortable and maximum). To measure the validity, we calculated the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the coefficient of variation (CV) for each parameter (gait cadence, stride time, step time, stance time, and single-support and double-support times). We also performed a graphical analysis using the Bland and Altman method.

Results: The footswitch system showed moderate-to-excellent concurrent validity vs. the GAITRite mat. The degree of agreement between the two assessments was greatest at the maximum gait velocity showed, with very good validity (ICC > 0.91) seen for most parameters, whereas agreement ranged from moderate to very good for the other speeds. Independently of the gait speed, the highest levels of agreement were recorded for gait velocity, cadence, stride time, step time, and stance time. According to the CVs, both systems showed the same accuracy and double-support time was the more variable parameter.

Significance: The ZeroWire® footswitch system appears to be valid for assessing temporal gait parameters (and particularly gait cadence and stride, step and stance times in healthy participants). It is likely to be well suited to the assessment of gait parameters under ecological conditions and in dual-task gait paradigms.

Keywords: Footswitch; GAITRite®; Gait; Gait analysis; ZeroWire®.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources