Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Nov:132:104615.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104615. Epub 2020 Sep 4.

Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection from combined nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab samples by a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR test and the Roche SARS-CoV-2 assay on a cobas 8800 instrument

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection from combined nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab samples by a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR test and the Roche SARS-CoV-2 assay on a cobas 8800 instrument

Catherine-Audrey Boutin et al. J Clin Virol. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: Although several assays have been developed to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical specimens, their relative performance is unknown.

Methods: The concordance between the cobas 8800 SARS-CoV-2 and a laboratory developed (LD) reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay was assessed on 377 combined nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs in Hanks medium.

Results: The positive and negative agreement between these assays were 99.3 % (95 % CI, 97.3-99.9) and 77.1 % (95 % CI, 67.7-84.4), respectively, for an overall agreement of 93.6 % (95 % CI, 90.7-95.7) beyond random chance (kappa of 0.82, 95 % CI, 0.75-0.85). Of the 22 samples positive by cobas SARS-CoV-2 only, 9 were positive only for ORF-1 gene and had Cycle thresholds (Ct) > 35.1, 8 were positive only for the E gene with Ct > 35.5 and 5 were positive for both targets with Ct > 33.9. Samples positive only with the cobas assay were more often positive with only one gene target (77.3 %) than samples positive in both assays (16.9 %, p < 0.0001). Ct values in the cobas SARS-CoV-2 assay were significantly higher in the 279 samples testing positive in both assays (32.9 %, 95 % CI 32.3-33.6) compared to the 22 samples with discordant results (36.6 %, 95 % CI 36.2-37.1; p = 0.0009). An excellent correlation (r2 = 0.98) was obtained between Ct values of the ORF-1 and E targets in the cobas assays and a good correlation was obtained between LD RT-PCR test and cobas SARS CoV-2 ORF-1 target (r2 = 0.82).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated an excellent concordance between a LD RT-PCR and the cobas SARS-CoV-2 tests on the 8800 platform.

Keywords: Cobas; Real time PCR; SARS-Cov-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Correlation between cycle thresholds (Ct) values obtained with the cobas 8800 SARS-CoV-2 assay for target -1 Orf1 gene and target 2 –E gene (pan-sabercovirus detection) in 279 positive samples for SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA. The dotted line is the 95 % confidence internal of the regression line.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Loeffelholz M.J., Tang Y.W. Laboratory diagnosis of emerging human coronavirus infections - the state of the art. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):747–756. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corman V.M., Landt O., Kaiser M., Molenkamp R., Meijer A., Chu D.K., et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(3) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poljak M., Korva M., Knap Gašper N., Fujs Komloš K., Sagadin M., Uršič T., et al. Clinical evaluation of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test and a diagnostic platform switch during 48 hours in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020;58(6) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrington A., Cox B., Snowdon J., Bakst J., Ley E., Grajales P., et al. Comparison of Abbott ID now and Abbott m2000 methods for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal and nasal swabs from symptomatic patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020;58(8) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleiss J.L. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc.; New York: 1981. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 1981.

Publication types