Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection from combined nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab samples by a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR test and the Roche SARS-CoV-2 assay on a cobas 8800 instrument
- PMID: 32927356
- PMCID: PMC7472968
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104615
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection from combined nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab samples by a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR test and the Roche SARS-CoV-2 assay on a cobas 8800 instrument
Abstract
Objective: Although several assays have been developed to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical specimens, their relative performance is unknown.
Methods: The concordance between the cobas 8800 SARS-CoV-2 and a laboratory developed (LD) reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay was assessed on 377 combined nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs in Hanks medium.
Results: The positive and negative agreement between these assays were 99.3 % (95 % CI, 97.3-99.9) and 77.1 % (95 % CI, 67.7-84.4), respectively, for an overall agreement of 93.6 % (95 % CI, 90.7-95.7) beyond random chance (kappa of 0.82, 95 % CI, 0.75-0.85). Of the 22 samples positive by cobas SARS-CoV-2 only, 9 were positive only for ORF-1 gene and had Cycle thresholds (Ct) > 35.1, 8 were positive only for the E gene with Ct > 35.5 and 5 were positive for both targets with Ct > 33.9. Samples positive only with the cobas assay were more often positive with only one gene target (77.3 %) than samples positive in both assays (16.9 %, p < 0.0001). Ct values in the cobas SARS-CoV-2 assay were significantly higher in the 279 samples testing positive in both assays (32.9 %, 95 % CI 32.3-33.6) compared to the 22 samples with discordant results (36.6 %, 95 % CI 36.2-37.1; p = 0.0009). An excellent correlation (r2 = 0.98) was obtained between Ct values of the ORF-1 and E targets in the cobas assays and a good correlation was obtained between LD RT-PCR test and cobas SARS CoV-2 ORF-1 target (r2 = 0.82).
Conclusion: Our study demonstrated an excellent concordance between a LD RT-PCR and the cobas SARS-CoV-2 tests on the 8800 platform.
Keywords: Cobas; Real time PCR; SARS-Cov-2.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no declarations of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Lack of sensitivity of an IVD/CE-labelled kit targeting the S gene for detection of SARS-CoV-2.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Oct;26(10):1417.e1-1417.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.036. Epub 2020 Jul 8. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020. PMID: 32652240 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical performance and sample freeze-thaw stability of the cobas®6800 SARS-CoV-2 assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in oro-/nasopharyngeal swabs and lower respiratory specimens.J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104686. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104686. Epub 2020 Nov 8. J Clin Virol. 2020. PMID: 33221622 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on a high-throughput molecular diagnostic platform and the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test for the diagnostic of COVID-19 on various clinical samples.Pathog Dis. 2020 Nov 11;78(8):ftaa061. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftaa061. Pathog Dis. 2020. PMID: 33030200 Free PMC article.
-
Detection profile of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR in different types of clinical specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):719-725. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26349. Epub 2020 Aug 2. J Med Virol. 2021. PMID: 32706393 Free PMC article.
-
Alternative clinical specimens for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review.Rev Med Virol. 2021 Jul;31(4):e2185. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2185. Epub 2020 Oct 22. Rev Med Virol. 2021. PMID: 33091200 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection with the Cobas® 6800/8800 system on gargle samples using two sample processing methods with combined oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab.J Med Virol. 2021 Dec;93(12):6837-6840. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27245. Epub 2021 Aug 5. J Med Virol. 2021. PMID: 34324212 Free PMC article.
-
Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA virus shedding and lymphopenia are hallmarks of COVID-19 in cancer patients with poor prognosis.Cell Death Differ. 2021 Dec;28(12):3297-3315. doi: 10.1038/s41418-021-00817-9. Epub 2021 Jul 6. Cell Death Differ. 2021. PMID: 34230615 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of saliva with oral and nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection on various commercial and laboratory-developed assays.J Med Virol. 2021 Sep;93(9):5333-5338. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27026. Epub 2021 May 3. J Med Virol. 2021. PMID: 33851739 Free PMC article.
-
ICAM-1 levels in patients with covid-19 with diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective study in southeast asia.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Mar;63:102171. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.02.017. Epub 2021 Feb 10. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021. PMID: 33585030 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Real-life Use of Point-of-care Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2 in Schools (EPOCRATES): a cohort study.CMAJ Open. 2022 Dec 6;10(4):E1027-E1033. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210327. Print 2022 Oct-Dec. CMAJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36622324 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fleiss J.L. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc.; New York: 1981. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 1981.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous