Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov:132:104633.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104633. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

Clinical performance of four immunoassays for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, including a prospective analysis for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in a real-life routine care setting

Affiliations

Clinical performance of four immunoassays for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, including a prospective analysis for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in a real-life routine care setting

Julien Marlet et al. J Clin Virol. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical performance of four SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays and their contribution in routine care for the diagnosis of COVID-19, in order to benefit of robust data before their extensive use.

Methods: The clinical performance of Euroimmun ELISA SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Wantai SARS-CoV-2 Ab ELISA, and DiaPro COVID-19 IgG confirmation were evaluated in the context of both a retrospective and a prospective analysis of COVID-19 patients. The retrospective analysis included plasma samples from 63 COVID-19 patients and 89 control (pre-pandemic) patients. The prospective study included 203 patients who tested either negative (n = 181) or positive (n = 22) by RT-PCR before serology sampling.

Results: The specificity was 92.1 %, 98.9 %, 100 % and 98.9 % and the sensitivity 14 days after onset of symptoms was 95.6 %, 95.6 %, 97.8 % and 95.6 % for Euroimmun IgG, Abbott IgG, Wantai Ab, and DiaPro IgG confirmation SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays, respectively. The low specificity of Euroimmun IgG (for ratio <5) was not confirmed in routine care setting (98.5 % negative agreement). Serology was complementary to RT-PCR in routine care and lead to identification of false positive (Ct>38, <2 targets detected) and false negative RT-PCR results (>1 month post onset of symptoms).

Conclusions: Serology was complementary to RT-PCR for the diagnosis of COVID-19 at least 14 days after onset of symptoms. First line serology testing can be performed with Wantai Ab or Abbott IgG assays, while DiaPro IgG confirmation assay can be used as an efficient confirmation assay.

Keywords: Antibody; CLIA; COVID-19; ELISA; Immunoassay; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; Serology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays. A) Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays results between COVID-19 patients and control patients. Black arrow indicates the heart transplant patient who tested negative with all immunoassays more than 14 days after onset of symptoms. B) ROC curves for evaluation of performances of SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays for samples ≥14 days post onset of symptoms.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Agreement between RT-PCR and serology for 203 patients. COVID-19 confirmed if positive RT-PCR (>1 gene) and/or Ab detected with two or more immunoassays.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Delay between serology and first RT-PCR or onset of symptoms. Delay between serology and first RT-PCR (plain dots) or onset of symptoms (empty dots). The dashed line represents early serology testing before 14 days after onset of symptoms.

References

    1. Zhu N., Zhang D., Wang W., Li X., Yang B., Song J., Zhao X., Huang B., Shi W., Lu R., Niu P., Zhan F., Ma X., Wang D., Xu W., Wu G., Gao G.F., Tan W. China novel coronavirus investigating and research team, a novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:727–733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wölfel R., Corman V.M., Guggemos W., Seilmaier M., Zange S., Müller M.A., Niemeyer D., Jones T.C., Vollmar P., Rothe C., Hoelscher M., Bleicker T., Brünink S., Schneider J., Ehmann R., Zwirglmaier K., Drosten C., Wendtner C. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peeling R.W., Wedderburn C.J., Garcia P.J., Boeras D., Fongwen N., Nkengasong J., Sall A., Tanuri A., Heymann D.L. Serology testing in the COVID-19 pandemic response. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30517-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eckerle I., Meyer B. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in COVID-19 hotspots. Lancet. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31482-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lassaunière R., Frische A., Harboe Z.B., Nielsen A.C., Fomsgaard A., Krogfelt K.A., Jørgensen C.S. Evaluation of nine commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays. Infect. Dis. (except HIV/AIDS) 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.04.09.20056325. - DOI

MeSH terms

Substances