Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Sep 14;20(1):147.
doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00715-1.

The effect of preoperative ureteral stenting in retrograde Intrarenal surgery: a multicenter, propensity score-matched study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The effect of preoperative ureteral stenting in retrograde Intrarenal surgery: a multicenter, propensity score-matched study

Hyeong Dong Yuk et al. BMC Urol. .

Abstract

Background: Stent placement before retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) can theoretically expand the ureter to improve access and remove stones. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of preoperative ureteral stenting on access and surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent RIRS between January 2010 and December 2016 at multiple centers. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not a ureteral stent was inserted preoperatively. The characteristics of the stone (size, number, density, and location), the success rate of the access sheath placement, perioperative complications, operative times, hospitalization periods, the period for which the stents remained, postoperative urinary tract infection rates, stone-free rates, and additional treatment rates were analyzed.

Results: Overall, 727 patients were included in the study (113 were pre-stented and 614 were non-stented). The median stone size was 12.2 mm. The overall stone-free rate (SFR) was 85.8% for the pre-stented group and 83.2% for the non-stented group, showing no significant (p = 0.498) difference between the two groups. Preoperative ureteral stenting improved the success rate of sheath placement (93.8% vs. 85.3%, p = 0.023) during surgery. The access sheath size in participants in the pre-stented group showed a tendency to be larger than that in participants in the non-stented group. However, there were no differences in perioperative complications, operative times, additional treatment rates, and stone-free rates.

Conclusions: Although preoperative ureteral stenting did not affect operative outcomes, it increased the success rate of access sheath placement. Depending on the patient's characteristics, preoperative ureteral stenting can be considered as an adjunctive option when access sheath insertion is considered during RIRS.

Keywords: Preoperative ureteral stenting; RIRS; Renal stone; Ureteral access sheath; Ureteral stent; Urolithiasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bultitude M, Smith D, Thomas K. Contemporary Management of Stone Disease: the new EAU Urolithiasis guidelines for 2015. Eur Urol. 2016;69:483–484. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breda A, Emiliani E, Millan F, et al. The new concept of ureteral access sheath with guidewire disengagement: one wire does it all. World J Urol. 2016;34:603–606. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1638-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keeley FX, Jr, Timoney AG, Barry MJ. Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J Urol. 2003;169:1065–1069. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000048980.33855.90. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lumma PP, Schneider P, Strauss A, et al. Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications. World J Urol. 2013;31:855–859. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0789-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, et al. Preoperative stenting for ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a large renal stone. Int J Urol. 2012;19:881–885. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03046.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types