Left ventricular dysfunction in atrial fibrillation and heart failure risk
- PMID: 32929859
- PMCID: PMC7754945
- DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12920
Left ventricular dysfunction in atrial fibrillation and heart failure risk
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the functional correlate, clinical relevance, and prognostic implications of novel left ventricular (LV) deformations in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
Methods and results: LV deformational indices, including peak global longitudinal strain (GLS), systolic strain rates (SRs), and early diastolic strain rates (SRe) were measured in a large-scale AF population. We related such measures to key clinical heart failure (HF) markers, conventional echocardiographic ventricular parameters, and clinical outcomes. Among 1483 subjects with newly diagnosed AF (mean age, 71.6 ± 12.4 years; 55.5% male), worsened GLS (mean, - 12.6 ± 3.9%) and strain rates (SRs and SRe: mean, - 0.86 ± 0.27 and 1.25 ± 0.41 1/s, respectively) by our three-beat measures were independently correlated with higher C-reactive protein, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, higher E/e', more impaired LV ejection fraction (LVEF < 50%), lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, permanent AF, and prevalent HF (all P < 0.05). LV deformations by three-beat analysis well correlated with the respective results of traditional methods. Abnormal GLS (>- 14.7%) was common in our cohort (67.8%) despite an averaged preserved LVEF (58.4 ± 14.2%), with worse GLS and SRe being associated with higher composite HF re-admissions/death during the 2.9 year follow-up (inter-quartile range, 1.6-4.1 years) in multivariate models incorporating key LV indices (LVEF, LV mass index, and E/e') (all P < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis by excluding those with regional wall motion abnormality showed broadly similar findings. An improved risk reclassification was observed when GLS and SRe were separately added to the LVEF. Comparison of the AF cohort with a fully matched independent non-AF cohort at the same baseline LVEF level showed a substantially lower GLS [- 13.2 ± 3.8% (AF) vs. 18.1 ± 3.2% (non-AF)] and higher clinical events rate (hazard ratio, 1.41 [95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.75]; log-rank P = 0.002) in the AF cohort.
Conclusions: Impaired LV function defined by myocardial deformation was common in patients with AF and provides independent prognostic values over conventional measures with improved risk prediction. Our data highlight the need for implementing cardiac deformations in daily practice for patients with AF.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Global longitudinal strain; Heart failure; Left ventricular deformation; Mortality; Strain rate.
© 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures





References
-
- Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population‐based estimates. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 2N–9N. - PubMed
-
- Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, Singer DE. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA 2001; 285: 2370–2375. - PubMed
-
- Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Cha SS, Bailey KR, Abhayaratna WP, Seward JB, Tsang TSM. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation 2006; 114: 119–125. - PubMed
-
- Grogan M, Smith HC, Gersh BJ, Wood DL. Left ventricular dysfunction due to atrial fibrillation in patients initially believed to have idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 1570–1573. - PubMed
-
- Saito M, Khan F, Stoklosa T, Iannaccone A, Negishi K, Marwick TH. Prognostic implications of LV strain risk score in asymptomatic patients with hypertensive heart disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 9: 911–921. - PubMed
Grants and funding
- 10271, 10248, 10220, 10253, 10375, 10358, E-102003/Mackay Memorial Hospital
- E-102003/Mackay Memorial Hospital
- 10358/Mackay Memorial Hospital
- 10375/Mackay Memorial Hospital
- 10253/Mackay Memorial Hospital
- 10220/Mackay Memorial Hospital
- 10248/Mackay Memorial Hospital
- 10271/Mackay Memorial Hospital
- NSC-101-2314-B-195-020, NSC103-2314-B-010-005-MY3, 103-2314-B-195-001-MY3, 101-2314-B-195 -020 -MY1, MOST 103-2314-B-195-006-MY3, and NSC102-2314-B-002-046-MY3, 106-2314-B-195 -008 -MY2/Ministry of Science and Technology
- 106-2314-B-195-008-MY2/Ministry of Science and Technology
- NSC102-2314-B-002-046-MY3/Ministry of Science and Technology
- MOST 103-2314-B-195-006-MY3/Ministry of Science and Technology
- 101-2314-B-195-020-MY1/Ministry of Science and Technology
- 103-2314-B-195-001-MY3/Ministry of Science and Technology
- NSC103-2314-B-010-005-MY3/Ministry of Science and Technology
- NSC-101-2314-B-195-020/Ministry of Science and Technology
- Taiwan Foundation for Geriatric Emergency and Critical Care
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous