Transrectal aspiration biopsy and punch biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma--a comparative study and literature review
- PMID: 3293060
Transrectal aspiration biopsy and punch biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma--a comparative study and literature review
Abstract
It can be concluded from the data presented here, that perineal punch biopsy is able to supply more reliable results than fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The advantage of aspiration biopsy, however, is its low incidence of complications. Since the application of both methods, namely transrectal aspiration biopsy and perineal punch biopsy, offers an additional factor of reliability, it appears worth-while to utilize both procedures in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate.
Similar articles
-
Retrospective analysis of 645 simultaneous perineal punch biopsies and transrectal aspiration biopsies for diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma.Eur Urol. 1977;3(1):29-34. doi: 10.1159/000472050. Eur Urol. 1977. PMID: 837951
-
Transrectal fine-needle aspiration and truecut needle biopsy of the prostate: a blinded comparison of accuracy.Can J Surg. 1989 Jul;32(4):287-9. Can J Surg. 1989. PMID: 2660974 Clinical Trial.
-
The effectiveness of transrectal aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer.Eur Urol. 1975;1(4):189-92. Eur Urol. 1975. PMID: 1233185
-
Fine-needle aspiration of the prostate.NCI Monogr. 1988;(7):19-24. NCI Monogr. 1988. PMID: 3050537 Review.
-
[Clinical significance of prostate cytology].Z Urol Nephrol. 1980;73(7):549-54. Z Urol Nephrol. 1980. PMID: 6998182 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical