Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Nov 10;38(32):3773-3784.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01255. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

Survival in Patients With Brain Metastases: Summary Report on the Updated Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment and Definition of the Eligibility Quotient

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Survival in Patients With Brain Metastases: Summary Report on the Updated Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment and Definition of the Eligibility Quotient

Paul W Sperduto et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Conventional wisdom has rendered patients with brain metastases ineligible for clinical trials for fear that poor survival could mask the benefit of otherwise promising treatments. Our group previously published the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). Updates with larger contemporary cohorts using molecular markers and newly identified prognostic factors have been published. The purposes of this work are to present all the updated indices in a single report to guide treatment choice, stratify research, and define an eligibility quotient to expand eligibility.

Methods: A multi-institutional database of 6,984 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases underwent multivariable analyses of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival for each primary site. Significant factors were used to define the updated GPA. GPAs of 4.0 and 0.0 correlate with the best and worst prognoses, respectively.

Results: Significant prognostic factors varied by diagnosis and new prognostic factors were identified. Those factors were incorporated into the updated GPA with robust separation (P < .01) between subgroups. Survival has improved, but varies widely by GPA for patients with non-small-cell lung, breast, melanoma, GI, and renal cancer with brain metastases from 7-47 months, 3-36 months, 5-34 months, 3-17 months, and 4-35 months, respectively.

Conclusion: Median survival varies widely and our ability to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases has improved. The updated GPA (available free at brainmetgpa.com) provides an accurate tool with which to estimate survival, individualize treatment, and stratify clinical trials. Instead of excluding patients with brain metastases, enrollment should be encouraged and those trials should be stratified by the GPA to ensure those trials make appropriate comparisons. Furthermore, we recommend the expansion of eligibility to allow for the enrollment of patients with previously treated brain metastases who have a 50% or greater probability of an additional year of survival (eligibility quotient > 0.50).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Kaplan-Meier curves for survival by diagnosis and the updated diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). BM, brain metastases; NSCLC, non–small-cell lung cancer;

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lin NU, Prowell T, Tan AR, et al. Modernizing clinical trial eligibility criteria: Recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology-Friends of Cancer Research brain metastases working group. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3760–3773. - PubMed
    1. Harvey RD, Rubinstein WS, Ison G, et al. Impact of broadening clinical trial eligibility criteria for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: Real-world analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(suppl; abstr LBA108) - PubMed
    1. Patel RR, Verma V, Miller AB, et al. Exclusion of patients with brain metastases from cancer clinical trials. Neuro-oncol. 2020;22:577–579. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gavrilovic IT, Posner JB. Brain metastases: Epidemiology and pathophysiology. J Neurooncol. 2005;75:5–14. - PubMed
    1. Karacz CM, Yan J, Zhu H, et al. Timing, sites, and correlates of lung cancer recurrence. Clin Lung Cancer. 2020;21:127–135.e3. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types