Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 4;60(1):53-65.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202010633. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

Frustrated Radical Pairs: Insights from EPR Spectroscopy

Affiliations
Review

Frustrated Radical Pairs: Insights from EPR Spectroscopy

Ayan Dasgupta et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

Progress in frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) chemistry has revealed the importance of the main group elements in catalysis, opening new avenues in synthetic chemistry. Recently, new reactivities of frustrated Lewis pairs have been uncovered that disclose that certain combinations of Lewis acids and bases undergo single-electron transfer (SET) processes. Here an electron can be transferred from the Lewis basic donor to a Lewis acidic acceptor to generate a reactive frustrated radical pair (FRP). This minireview aims to showcase the recent advancements in this emerging field covering the synthesis and reactivities of frustrated radical pairs, with extensive highlights of the results from Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy to explain the nature and stability of the different radical species observed.

Keywords: electron paramagnetic resonance; frustrated Lewis pair; main group chemistry; radicals; single-electron transfer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Generic representation of the reactivity of FLPs and FRPs in the activation of small molecules.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Isotropic and anisotropic EPR spectra of Mes3P.+ (1 left), and (Mes2P)2 .+ (15 right), simulated using data reported in Table 1.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
P/Al FLP‐mediated N2O and C–H activation of toluene and bromobenzene.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Contrasting reaction pathways between FLPs and FRPs when using tBu3P/Mes3P and B(C6F5)3.
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
P/B FLP‐mediated homolytic cleavage of peroxides.
Scheme 5
Scheme 5
The divergent reactivities of FLPs towards diaryl esters.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Isotropic CW EPR spectra of 12, 10 and 7 (left), and 8‐TMS and 5 (right), simulated using data reported in Table 1.
Scheme 6
Scheme 6
Single‐electron oxidation of an amine by B(C6F5)3.
Scheme 7
Scheme 7
Generation of radical species with or without light (top), and C−C bond formation reaction through single‐electron transfer (bottom).
Scheme 8
Scheme 8
Synthesis of carbon‐based radical species bearing a N,N′‐dimesityldiamidocarbene group.
Scheme 9
Scheme 9
Generation of radical pair species bearing Ge and B.
Scheme 10
Scheme 10
Generation of carbon‐ and phosphorus‐based radical pairs.
Scheme 11
Scheme 11
Formation of carbon‐based radicals.
Scheme 12
Scheme 12
Germanium‐ and carbon‐/silicon‐based radical pairs.
Scheme 13
Scheme 13
Reaction of silylium borate with Tipp3P and Mes3P (top), and the synthesis of solvent‐stabilized silylium borates and subsequent generation of phosphorus‐ and silicon‐based radicals (bottom).
Scheme 14
Scheme 14
Synthesis and reactivity of intramolecular FLP‐NO radicals.
Scheme 15
Scheme 15
Formation of persistent nitroxide radicals under frustrated Lewis pair conditions.
Scheme 16
Scheme 16
Single‐electron oxidation of tBu3P by a nitrosonium borate salt.

References

    1. For reviews see:
    1. Lam J., Szkop K. M., Mosaferi E., Stephan D. W., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 3592–3612; - PubMed
    1. Jupp A. R., Stephan D. W., Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 35–48;
    1. Liu L., Lukose B., Jaque P., Ensing B., Green Energy Environ. 2019, 4, 20–28;
    1. Scott D. J., Fuchter M. J., Ashley A. E., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 5689–5700; - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources