Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 11;10(9):687.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090687.

The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment

Affiliations
Review

The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment

Polina Giannelou et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Despite recent striking advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART), poor ovarian response (POR) diagnosis and treatment is still considered challenging. Poor responders constitute a heterogeneous cohort with the common denominator of under-responding to controlled ovarian stimulation. Inevitably, respective success rates are significantly compromised. As POR pathophysiology entails the elusive factor of compromised ovarian function, both diagnosis and management fuel an ongoing heated debate depicted in the literature. From the criteria employed for diagnosis to the plethora of strategies and adjuvant therapies proposed, the conundrum of POR still puzzles the practitioner. What is more, novel treatment approaches from stem cell therapy and platelet-rich plasma intra-ovarian infusion to mitochondrial replacement therapy have emerged, albeit not claiming clinical routine status yet. The complex and time sensitive nature of this subgroup of infertile patients indicates the demand for a consensus on a horizontally accepted definition, diagnosis and subsequent effective treating strategy. This critical review analyzes the standing criteria employed in order to diagnose and aptly categorize POR patients, while it proceeds to critically evaluate current and novel strategies regarding their management. Discrepancies in diagnosis and respective implications are discussed, while the existing diversity in management options highlights the need for individualized management.

Keywords: Bologna criteria; Poseidon group; adjuvant treatment; diagnosis; gonadotropin stimulation; management; novel approaches; poor ovarian response; second follicular wave.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Wade J.J., MacLachlan V., Kovacs G. The success rate of IVF has significantly improved over the last decade. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015;55:473–476. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12356. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gonda K.J., Domar A.D., Gleicher N., Marrs R.P. Insights from clinical experience in treating IVF poor responders. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2018;36:12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.09.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y., Zhang C., Shu J., Guo J., Chang H.-M., Leung P.C.K., Sheng J.-Z., Huang H. Adjuvant treatment strategies in ovarian stimulation for poor responders undergoing IVF: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2020;26:247–263. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Merviel P., Cabry-Goubet R., Lourdel E., Devaux A., Belhadri-Mansouri N., Copin H., Benkhalifa M. Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: Effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy. Reprod. Health. 2015;12:52. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0039-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jamaludin R., Ahmad M.F., Park D.-K., Zain M.M., Yoon T.-K., Lee W.-S., Koong M.K., Lee K.-A. The stimulation protocol in poor responder IVF; a minimal or high-dose stimulation?—A meta-analysis. Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2019 doi: 10.1515/hmbci-2019-0018. - DOI - PubMed