Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 15;20(1):120.
doi: 10.1186/s12862-020-01666-9.

Further resolution of the house mouse (Mus musculus) phylogeny by integration over isolation-with-migration histories

Affiliations

Further resolution of the house mouse (Mus musculus) phylogeny by integration over isolation-with-migration histories

Megan Phifer-Rixey et al. BMC Evol Biol. .

Abstract

Background: The three main subspecies of house mice, Mus musculus castaneus, Mus musculus domesticus, and Mus musculus musculus, are estimated to have diverged ~ 350-500KYA. Resolution of the details of their evolutionary history is complicated by their relatively recent divergence, ongoing gene flow among the subspecies, and complex demographic histories. Previous studies have been limited to some extent by the number of loci surveyed and/or by the scope of the method used. Here, we apply a method (IMa3) that provides an estimate of a population phylogeny while allowing for complex histories of gene exchange.

Results: Results strongly support a topology with M. m. domesticus as sister to M. m. castaneus and M. m. musculus. In addition, we find evidence of gene flow between all pairs of subspecies, but that gene flow is most restricted from M. m. musculus into M. m. domesticus. Estimates of other key parameters are dependent on assumptions regarding generation time and mutation rate in house mice. Nevertheless, our results support previous findings that the effective population size, Ne, of M. m. castaneus is larger than that of the other two subspecies, that the three subspecies began diverging ~ 130 - 420KYA, and that the time between divergence events was short.

Conclusions: Joint demographic and phylogenetic analyses of genomic data provide a clearer picture of the history of divergence in house mice.

Keywords: Divergence; IMa3; Population size; Speciation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Representations of estimated IM models generated by IMa3 and the IMfig program [37] for the three subspecies of house mouse. The phylogeny is depicted as a series of boxes organized hierarchically, with ancestor boxes positioned in between the corresponding descendants, and the width of boxes proportional to estimated Ne. Gray arrows extending to the left and right of the right boundary of each population box depict 95% confidence intervals for Ne values. Splitting times are depicted as solid horizontal lines, with text values on the left. Confidence intervals for splitting times are shown as vertical gray arrows on the left, and parallel dashed lines. Migration arrows (if shown) indicate estimated 2 Nm values from one population to another over the time interval when both populations exist. Arrows are shown only for estimated migration rates that are statistically significant at or above the 0.05 level (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 [33]). (a) without a ghost population (b) with a ghost population included. Estimates assume 1.5 generations/year and 6 × 10−9 mutations per base pair per generation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A representation of an estimated IM model generated by IMa3 and the IMfig program [37] for house mice using six nuclear loci from Geraldes et al. [27]. Details are as given in Fig. 1. Estimates assume 1.5 generations/year and 6 × 10−9 mutations per base pair per generation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morse HC. The laboratory mouse—A historical perspective. In: Foster HL, Small JD, Fox JG, editors. The mouse in biomedical research. New York: Academic Press; 1981. pp. 1–16.
    1. Morse HC. Building a better mouse: One hundred years of genetics and biology. In: Fox JG, Barthold SW, Davisson MT, Newcomer CE, Quimby FW, Smith SL, editors. The mouse in biomedical research. 2. San Diego: Academic Press; 2007. pp. 1–11.
    1. Phifer-Rixey M, Nachman MW. Insights into mammalian biology from the wild house mouse Mus musculus. eLife. 2015;4:e05959. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ardlie KG, Silver LM. Low frequency of mouse t haplotypes in wild populations is not explained by modifiers of meiotic drive. Genetics. 1996;144:1787–1797. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Song Y, Endepols S, Klemann N, Richter D, Matuschka F-R, Shih C-H, et al. Adaptive introgression of anticoagulant rodent poison resistance by hybridization between old world mice. Curr Biol. 2011;21(15):1296–1301. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources