Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 5;4(1):1124.
doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.1124.

The Concept Dictionary and Glossary at MCHP: Tools and Techniques to Support a Population Research Data Repository

Affiliations

The Concept Dictionary and Glossary at MCHP: Tools and Techniques to Support a Population Research Data Repository

M Smith et al. Int J Popul Data Sci. .

Abstract

The Manitoba Centre for Health Policy's Concept Dictionary and Glossary, and the Data Repository they document, broaden the analytic possibilities associated with administrative data. The aim of the Repository is to describe and explain patterns of health care and illness, while the Concept Dictionary and Glossary create consistency in documenting research methodologies. The Concept Dictionary alone contains detailed operational definitions and programming code for measures used in MCHP research that are reusable in future projects. Making these tools available on the internet allows reaching a heterogeneous audience of academic and government health service partners, epidemiologists, planners, programmers, clinicians, and students extending around the globe. They aid in the retention of corporate knowledge, facilitate researcher/analyst communication, and enhance the Centre's knowledge translation activities. Such documentation has saved countless hours for programmers, analysts and researchers who frequently need to tread paths previously taken by others.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Statement on conflicts of Interest: The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

References

    1. Jutte DP, Roos LL, Brownell M. Administrative record linkage as a tool for public health research. Annu Rev Public Health 2011 32:91-108. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-100700 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams DR, McClellan MB, Rivlin AM. Beyond the affordable care act: Achieving real improvements in Americans’ health. Health Aff 2010 29(8):1481-1488. 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0071 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith M, Roos LL, Burchill C. Expanding the data repository: New technology and resources for the 21st century. Healthc Pol 2011 6(Special Issue):104-106. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319584/ 10.12927/hcpol.2011.22130 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quan H, Li B, Saunders DL, Parsons GA, Nilsson CI, Alibhai A, Ghali WA for the IMECCHI investigators. Assessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually-coded database. Health Serv Res August2008 43(4):1424-1444. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00822.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Finlayson GS, Lix LM, Roos LL. The whole is greater than the sum of the parts: Using data linkage and cohort designs to create data synergy at MCHP. Healthc Pol 2011 6(Special Issue):83-85. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319577/ 10.12927/hcpol.2011.22123 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources