Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Nov;37(11):2643-2651.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01940-1. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

Impact on using cryopreservation of testicular or epididymal sperm upon intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in men with obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hanchao Liu  1 , Yun Xie  1 , Linzhi Gao  2 , Xiangzhou Sun  1 , Xiaoyan Liang  2 , Chunhua Deng  1 , Yong Gao  3 , Guihua Liu  4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Impact on using cryopreservation of testicular or epididymal sperm upon intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in men with obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hanchao Liu et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether there was a significant impact on using cryopreservation of testicular or epididymal sperm upon the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients with obstructive azoospermia (OA).

Method: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 retrospective studies in databases from January 1, 1995, to June 1, 2020.

Result: Twenty articles were included in this study. A total of 3602 (64.1%) of 5616 oocytes injected with fresh epididymal sperm were fertilized, compared with 2366 (61.2%) of 3862 oocytes injected with cryopreserved sperm (relative risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.90, 1.02), P > 0.05). A total of 303 (44.1%) of 687 ICSI cycles using fresh epididymal sperm resulted in a clinical pregnancy, compared with 150 (36.6%) of 410 ICSI cycles using cryopreserved epididymal sperm (RR 0.84, 95% CI (0.72, 0.97), P < 0.05). In the testis, a total of 2147 (68.7%) of 3125 oocytes injected with fresh sperm were fertilized, compared with 1623 (63.5%) of 2557 oocytes injected with cryopreserved sperm (RR 0.97, 95% CI (0.90, 1.06), P > 0.05). A total of 151 (47.8%) of 316 ICSI cycles using fresh testicular sperm resulted in a clinical pregnancy, compared with 113 (38.2%) of 296 ICSI cycles using cryopreserved sperm (RR 0.87, 95% CI (0.72, 1.05), P > 0.05).

Conclusions: In men with OA, there was a statistical lower clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) by using frozen epididymal sperm compared with fresh epididymal sperm, but showing no difference on fertilization rate (FR). Additionally, FR and CPR were not affected by whether the retrieved testicular sperm was frozen or fresh.

Keywords: Cryopreservation; Epididymal spermatozoa; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Obstructive azoospermia; Testicular spermatozoa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the studies identified, included, and excluded
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot and meta-analysis of fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate on using epididymal sperm in ICSI. a Forest plot for fertilization rate. b Forest plot for clinical pregnancy rate. Experimental means frozen group. Control means fresh group. CI, confidence interval; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel method
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot and meta-analysis of fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate on using testicular sperm in ICSI. a Forest plot for fertilization rate. b Forest plot for clinical pregnancy rate. Experimental means frozen group. Control means fresh group. CI, confidence interval; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel method
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol. 1989;142(1):62–65. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38662-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wosnitzer MS, Goldstein M. Obstructive azoospermia. Urol Clin N Am. 2014;41(1):83–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2013.08.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sperm retrieval for obstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5 Suppl):S213-8. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.047. - PubMed
    1. The management of obstructive azoospermia: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(5):873-80. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.013. - PubMed
    1. Ohlander S, Hotaling J, Kirshenbaum E, Niederberger C, Eisenberg ML. Impact of fresh versus cryopreserved testicular sperm upon intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancy outcomes in men with azoospermia due to spermatogenic dysfunction: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):344–349. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.012. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources