Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 11:75:e1764.
doi: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1764. eCollection 2020.

Accuracy of a portable breath meter test for the detection of halitosis in children and adolescents

Affiliations

Accuracy of a portable breath meter test for the detection of halitosis in children and adolescents

Carolina Cardoso Guedes et al. Clinics (Sao Paulo). .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the Breath-Alert™ portable breath meter (BA) for the detection of halitosis in children and adolescents, considering the organoleptic test (OT) as the gold standard in this assessment.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 150 children (aged 6-12 years). OT was performed by three independent examiners on a single occasion, obtaining three scores of 0-5 points on the Rosenberg's organoleptic scale. The median of the three evaluations for each child was used for analysis. BA was used according to the manufacturer's instructions, with breath odor scored from 0-5 points. Scores ≥2 on both tests were considered indicative of halitosis.

Results: A total of 26 (17.3%) and 23 (15.3%) children were detected with halitosis on the OT and BA tests, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the BA scores for the detection of halitosis were 80.76% and 98.38%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values for BA were 91.3% and 96.06%, respectively.

Conclusion: In the present study involving children, who require fast, practical examinations, BA proved to be an auxiliary tool to OT for the detection of halitosis in the practice of pediatric dentistry, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Halitosis scoring using a Breath-Alert™ device.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kara C, Tezel A, Orbak R. Effect of oral hygiene instruction and scaling on oral malodour in a population of Turkish children with gingival inflammation. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2006;16(6):399–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00769.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bosy A. Oral malodor: philosophical and practical aspects. J Canadian Assoc. 1997;63(3):196–201. - PubMed
    1. Miyazaki H, Sakao S, Katoh Y, Takehara T. Correlation between volatile sulphur compounds and certain oral health measurements in the general population. J Periodontol. 1995;66(8):679–84. doi: 10.1902/jop.1995.66.8.679. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs Oral malodor. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(2):209–14. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0135. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gonçalves MLL, da Mota ACC, Deana AM, Cavalcante LAS, Horliana ACRT, Pavani C, et al. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with Bixa orellana extract and blue LED in the reduction of halitosis - A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020;30:101751. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101751. - DOI - PubMed

Substances