Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Dec 1;155(12):1102-1111.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3672.

Effect of Prophylactic Embolization on Patients With Blunt Trauma at High Risk of Splenectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Prophylactic Embolization on Patients With Blunt Trauma at High Risk of Splenectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Catherine Arvieux et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Splenic arterial embolization (SAE) improves the rate of spleen rescue, yet the advantage of prophylactic SAE (pSAE) compared with surveillance and then embolization only if necessary (SURV) for patients at high risk of spleen rupture remains controversial.

Objective: To determine whether the 1-month spleen salvage rate is better after pSAE or SURV.

Design, setting, and participants: In this randomized clinical trial conducted between February 6, 2014, and September 1, 2017, at 16 institutions in France, 133 patients with splenic trauma at high risk of rupture were randomized to undergo pSAE or SURV. All analyses were performed on a per-protocol basis, as well as an intention-to-treat analysis for specific events.

Interventions: Prophylactic SAE, preferably using an arterial approach via the femoral artery, or SURV.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was an intact spleen or a spleen with at least 50% vascularized parenchyma detected on an arterial computed tomography scan at 1 month after trauma, assessed by senior radiologists masked to the treatment group. Secondary end points included splenectomy and pseudoaneurysm, secondary SAE after inclusion, complications, length of hospital stay, quality-of-life score, and length of time off work or studies during the 6-month follow-up.

Results: A total of 140 patients were randomized, and 133 (105 men [78.9%]; median age, 30 years [interquartile range, 23-47 years]) were retained in the study. For the primary end point, data from 117 patients (57 who underwent pSAE and 60 who underwent SURV) could be analyzed. The number of patients with at least a 50% viable spleen detected on a computed tomography scan at month 1 was not significantly different between the pSAE and SURV groups (56 of 57 [98.2%] vs 56 of 60 [93.3%]; difference, 4.9%; 95% CI, -2.4% to 12.1%; P = .37). By the day 5 visit, there were significantly fewer splenic pseudoaneurysms among patients in the pSAE group than in the SURV group (1 of 65 [1.5%] vs 8 of 65 [12.3%]; difference, -10.8%; 95% CI, -19.3% to -2.1%; P = .03), significantly fewer secondary embolizations among patients in the pSAE group than in the SURV group (1 of 65 [1.5%] vs 19 of 65 [29.2%]; difference, -27.7%; 95% CI, -41.0% to -15.9%; P < .001), and no difference in the overall complication rate between the pSAE and SURV groups (19 of 65 [29.2%] vs 27 of 65 [41.5%]; difference, -12.3%; 95% CI, -28.3% to 4.4%; P = .14). Between the day 5 and month 1 visits, the overall complication rate was not significantly different between the pSAE and SURV groups (11 of 59 [18.6%] vs 12 of 63 [19.0%]; difference, -0.4%; 95% CI, -14.4% to 13.6%; P = .96). The median length of hospitalization was significantly shorter for patients in the pSAE group than for those in the SURV group (9 days [interquartile range, 6-14 days] vs 13 days [interquartile range, 9-17 days]; P = .002).

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with splenic trauma at high risk of rupture, the 1-month spleen salvage rate was not statistically different between patients undergoing pSAE compared with those receiving SURV. In view of the high proportion of patients in the SURV group needing SAE, both strategies appear defendable.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02021396.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Arvieux reported receiving grants from the French Ministry of Health, Hospital Clinical Research Program (PHRC) 2012, given to CHU Grenoble Alpes, during the conduct of the study. Dr David reported receiving personal fees from LFB Laboratory outside the submitted work. Dr Rodiere reported receiving grants from the French Ministry of Health, Hospital Clinical Research Program (PHRC) 2012, given to CHU Grenoble Alpes, during the conduct of the study. Dr Bouzat reported receiving grants from LFB Laboratory outside the submitted work. Dr Thony reported receiving grants from the French Ministry of Health, Hospital Clinical Research Program (PHRC) 2012, given to CHU Grenoble Alpes, during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Study Flowchart
CT indicates computed tomography; OIS, Organ Injury Scale; pSAE, prophylactic splenic arterial embolization; and SURV, surveillance with embolization only if necessary. aSee eTable 1 in Supplement 2 for reasons for ineligibility. bDay 5 visit occurred between day 4 and day 8 after inclusion.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Comparison of the Total Length of Hospitalization
For prophylactic splenic arterial embolization (pSAE), the median length of hospitalization was 9 days (interquartile range, 6-14 days). For surveillance and then embolization only if necessary (SURV), the median length of hospitalization was 13 days (interquartile range, 9-17 days) (P = .002). The horizontal lines indicate the median. The vertical lines indicate the 2 groups.

Comment in

References

    1. Zarzaur BL, Rozycki GS. An update on nonoperative management of the spleen in adults. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017;2(1):e000075. doi:10.1136/tsaco-2017-000075 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Requarth JA, D’Agostino RB Jr, Miller PR. Nonoperative management of adult blunt splenic injury with and without splenic artery embolotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2011;71(4):898-903. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318227ea50 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zarzaur BL, Croce MA, Fabian TC. Variation in the use of urgent splenectomy after blunt splenic injury in adults. J Trauma. 2011;71(5):1333-1339. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318224d0e4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnoletti JP, Karam J, Brodsky J. Early postoperative complications of splenectomy for hematologic disease. Am J Clin Oncol. 1999;22(2):114-118. doi:10.1097/00000421-199904000-00002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aiolfi A, Inaba K, Strumwasser A, et al. . Splenic artery embolization versus splenectomy: analysis for early in-hospital infectious complications and outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(3):356-360. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001550 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data