Prognosticating Outcomes and Nudging Decisions with Electronic Records in the Intensive Care Unit Trial Protocol
- PMID: 32936675
- PMCID: PMC8020719
- DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202002-088SD
Prognosticating Outcomes and Nudging Decisions with Electronic Records in the Intensive Care Unit Trial Protocol
Abstract
Expert recommendations to discuss prognosis and offer palliative options for critically ill patients at high risk of death are variably heeded by intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians. How to best promote such communication to avoid potentially unwanted aggressive care is unknown. The PONDER-ICU (Prognosticating Outcomes and Nudging Decisions with Electronic Records in the ICU) study is a 33-month pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial testing the effectiveness of two electronic health record (EHR) interventions designed to increase ICU clinicians' engagement of critically ill patients at high risk of death and their caregivers in discussions about all treatment options, including care focused on comfort. We hypothesize that the quality of care and patient-centered outcomes can be improved by requiring ICU clinicians to document a functional prognostic estimate (intervention A) and/or to provide justification if they have not offered patients the option of comfort-focused care (intervention B). The trial enrolls all adult patients admitted to 17 ICUs in 10 hospitals in North Carolina with a preexisting life-limiting illness and acute respiratory failure requiring continuous mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours. Eligibility is determined using a validated algorithm in the EHR. The sequence in which hospitals transition from usual care (control), to intervention A or B and then to combined interventions A + B, is randomly assigned. The primary outcome is hospital length of stay. Secondary outcomes include other clinical outcomes, palliative care process measures, and nurse-assessed quality of dying and death.Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03139838).
Keywords: artificial respiration; clinical trial; critical care; palliative care.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Nudging Clinicians to Promote Serious Illness Communication for Critically Ill Patients: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2025 May 1;185(5):510-520. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0090. JAMA Intern Med. 2025. PMID: 40094649 Clinical Trial.
-
Protocol for a randomised trial of an interprofessional team-delivered intervention to support surrogate decision-makers in ICUs.BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 29;10(3):e033521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033521. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32229520 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing nudges to promote utilization of low tidal volume ventilation (INPUT): a stepped-wedge, hybrid type III trial of strategies to improve evidence-based mechanical ventilation management.Implement Sci. 2021 Aug 10;16(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01147-7. Implement Sci. 2021. PMID: 34376233 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Surrogate Decision-making Interventions for Critically Ill Adults With Patient, Family, and Resource Use Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197229. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7229. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 31322688 Free PMC article.
-
Current evidence on ω-3 fatty acids in enteral nutrition in the critically ill: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Nutrition. 2019 Mar;59:56-68. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 31. Nutrition. 2019. PMID: 30419501
Cited by
-
Nudging Clinicians to Promote Serious Illness Communication for Critically Ill Patients: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2025 May 1;185(5):510-520. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0090. JAMA Intern Med. 2025. PMID: 40094649 Clinical Trial.
-
Oncologist Perceptions of Algorithm-Based Nudges to Prompt Early Serious Illness Communication: A Qualitative Study.J Palliat Med. 2022 Nov;25(11):1702-1707. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0095. Epub 2022 Aug 18. J Palliat Med. 2022. PMID: 35984992 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Determining Goal Concordant Care in the Intensive Care Unit Using Electronic Health Records.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Mar;65(3):e199-e205. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 17. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023. PMID: 36400406 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological Determinants of Physician Variation in End-of-Life Treatment Intensity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(6):1516-1525. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-08011-4. Epub 2023 Feb 2. J Gen Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 36732436 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic nudge tool technology used in the critical care and peri-anaesthetic setting: a scoping review protocol.BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 12;12(7):e057026. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057026. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35820751 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Weissfeld LA, Watson RS, Rickert T, et al. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:638–643. - PubMed
-
- Kwok AC, Semel ME, Lipsitz SR, Bader AM, Barnato AE, Gawande AA, et al. The intensity and variation of surgical care at the end of life: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378:1408–1413. - PubMed
-
- Committee on Care at the End of Life, Institute of Medicine Fields MJ, Cassel CK.editors. Approaching death, improving care at the end of life Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997
-
- People’s memo to politicians: this is not your fight Time Magazine 2005 April 4 [accessed 2016 Jul 26]. Available from: http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1042447,00.html
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical